Traps, Flaps and Scraps, Part 2: Liberty Solutions

Posted on Updated on

The story so far: The pivotal months ahead of the 2020 Presidential election have seen a powerful dynamic act of mass triangulation at play. Riot friendly, mob-driven protests (coupled with the “COVID crisis” tyranny) have acted as rainmakers to move the country towards anarchistic discontent, compatible with creating a “new normal” designed to put people in a mood to dispose of the current troublesome occupant of the White House. The perpetrators are brain dead talking point NPC mob bot mutants, who should not be confused with old time liberal intellectuals who will at least try to make a reasoned argument. You know, the sensible kind who advise social tolerance, versus the new kind who support “cancel culture.” The ones who will argue for bigger government based on some study, versus the new kind who advance programs by defining all their opponents as racists or anti-science. And so on.

The once professional, now mob left is now LITERALLY tearing America down, as seen by their toppling and defacing statues of various Founding Fathers, and the disrespectful and spiteful attacks on ALL cops, not just the ones suspected of brutality. Let that truly sink in. Trump will be able to use all the violent “protest” footage in commercials this late summer and fall, to explicitly show his opponents are a destructive force. You can already write the copy for the commercial messages.

This is another example of the contempt the “culturally superior” left has for the working class not under their umbrella, AKA the deplorables. This elitist contempt extends to the police, who are mostly made up of working class people. There is even some post-election war gaming going on about some left parts of the country seceding if they don’t get the results they want in November. So, time to apply some liberty Growth Hacking to this conundrum of chaos, that is the crescendo of the integrated plan to oust the leader (for better or worse) of the populist-libertarian or outsider trend. Trump has made more defacto victories for peace and freedom at least possible for Main Street people in recent years, and this dynamic should be protected. Some specific ‘hacking tactics’ will be mentioned below, as part of a combined strategy for people to put up a “scrap” to stop this madness.

The Summer of Organized Chaos

Exactly what does the death of George Floyd in Minnesota from two months ago, have to do with removing statues of Presidents in NYC? As the old song goes, “…and you may ask yourself, well, how did I get here?” How did we go from civilization, to slaves wearing face diapers, and playing a new version of Duck and Cover both with respect to a virus no more deadly than the seasonal flu, and to lawless demonstrations that follows no rule other than the authoritarian bromide, “do as I say?” Who put this unelected mob in charge of our lives, or of CHOP zones, leaving us with scraps?

In short, the pro forma radicalization of the street statists and DC statists this election cycle has aimed to move the Overton window (the window of acceptable mainstream discourse) even further in a cultural authoritarian direction than it already was. Forget the two-way party puppet show—it’s the Swamp that wants Trump gone in a few months so they can reverse the pullout from Afghanistan, and other insurgent “forever war” zones. The shampeachment didn’t work, COVID plannedemic didn’t work, the race riots didn’t work, so it’s back to “Trump isn’t keeping us safe abroad, and is in bed with Russia” again. If that doesn’t work, they’ll roll out another sex scandal….

And just as the post Floyd protests have been shown to be clearly coordinated, the sudden parade of military never-Trumpers who “just happened” to swiftly appear for interviews the week after to condemn the President’s response, is also NOT spontaneous. I think as stated previously, the plan was to goad Trump into quickly sending out troops to deal with the riots, resulting in even more violence, that would be blamed on his “recklessness.” This is why the Dem Mayors and Governors held back bringing in the guard, they were trying to draw Trump in first. The point is the generals were queued up to be ready to slam him regardless of how he handled it, but would have really had the ammo to nail him had there been more violence. Could this be why (by telling the Mayors to do their jobs) Trump pre-empted the blue-state pols who tried to get him to commit troops first to deal with the rioters? Did he suspect there might be some people with access to uniforms out to fake being guardsmen or other law enforcement, who would then mow down black protestors, and so escalate the matter still further? Did the blue-state Dems suspect this as well, nonetheless worked to set Trump up to be blamed for the violence?

As for the possible outcome of the trial of the officers involved in George Floyd’s death: The key issue in court would be reasonable doubt, and police immunity based on following established protocol. The facts pointing to homocide in the case of Floyd are obvious, but so is the fact that the engagement tactics used came right out of the city’s current police training protocol. Following those procedures is what helps create immunity for police, for their actions in a given case. In addition, some evidence (from the police video cam and transcript) can be used by the defense to assert that Floyd already had respiratory problems (from drug abuse), regardless of the knee-on-neck hold aggravating his condition. That existing protocol and the counter evidence may be sufficient to establish reasonable doubt over whether the homocide was premeditated (or even reckless) to a jury. Police are acquitted about 95% of the time of brutality charges on this basis, so I wouldn’t be surprised if Derek Chauvin, and the other cops there, were acquitted on a murder in the first degree (or even second degree) charge. I brought these and other points up in a recent video exchange with my classical liberal peers:

This is why Libertarians complain that there are way too aggressive, overly militaristic tactics going on in current police engagement of suspects. This issue gets distorted by many liberals, who falsely attribute every such incident to racism, or by some conservatives, who often deify cops and think they can never make a mistake. We need more Andy Griffith, less SWAT team mentality by modern law enforcement. The vast majority of suspects who have been subjected to excessively harsh engagement were not armed with assault rifles, explosives or the like. The abuse is arguably worse at the federal level (obvious example, the SWAT team arrests of unarmed senior citizens Paul Manafort and Roger Stone) but you get the idea.

Go, Go, Jo Jo?

Meanwhile, a few thoughts on notable alternatives. Are there better choices to address these matters than Trump or Biden? On paper, yes, but…. recapping the stakes: If the swamp-backed candidate wins even once, we will lose for decades. 2016 was a crucial election because the forces pushing globalist takeover were all in position to pounce. Hillary would have packed the Supreme Court with two or more lockstep liberals, thus no pro-Constitutional decision would ever happen again. That court would have already destroyed the Second Amendment. She would have locked the US into TPP and the Climate Change Accords, and other bureaucratic expansions of the global omnipotent state. In 2020, the same “on the brink” debacle awaits us if the mob left-dominated forces succeed.

In this environment, can the LP candidacy of Jo Jorgenson offer an alternative means of holding back these demonic consequences? Can she package libertarian policy in a way that breaks the party out of its 5% status, and builds on the vote totals Gary Johnson achieved for the party four years ago? She’s running for President, but is anybody running for, or towards her? My own sentiment is that only a scrappy, charismatic crusader type like Adam Kokesh (had he been nominated) may have worked to create a mass coalition, that could have taken an explicitly Libertarian candidacy to victory in 2020.

Yes, He Kanye

And then there’s Hip Hop star and Trump-friendly celebrity Kanye West running, who is gathering signatures as of this writing in key states (well, at least the ones he can still make the deadline for). Before people laugh, remember the last time mainstream folks all chuckled over a flamboyant tycoon announcing his bid for office, was when Donald came down the escalator. The laughing stops once they realize Kanye is probably not serious about winning in 2020, but in making an impact now, in preparation for his real run in 2024. He can especially accomplish this by scooping up enough centrist Democratic votes, to deprive Dems of any popular vote victory for Joe Biden. And given Trump’s support among both Blacks and Latinos hovers at around 29%, Kanye’s run isn’t so out there.

Kanye’s campaign also offers a fresh, more viable path for that party to proceed in the future untethered to either the corrupt corporate shills, or the opportunistic extremists who currently dominate it at the top. E.g., the small NC city of Asheville recently voted on adopting a plan to provide reparations for slavery. National Democrats hailed this for being a major act of progress on the issue, as Asheville had started a wave of momentum for reparations we haven’t seen since Obama first came into the White House. Oh, wait—there was no wave back then, no legislation passed at any level when Democrats had complete control of the government 10 years ago. Nor during the first two years of Clinton, when Democrats were also in complete control. This issue ONLY comes up three months before an election, to rile up the black vote, and to put pressure on Republicans. Not that many black voters will notice, if Trump brings this up. But they just might listen if Kanye does….

Problem, Principle, Solution, Transition

Even politically astute persons sometimes do not appreciate this educational function of certain candidacies and commentators, in delivering the case for a perspective to a mass audience. It’s literally one of the reasons for the success of FOX News, and similar entities who addressed a market (working class middle Americans) others had abandoned or shunned. The three weekday evening FOX shows, for example, follow a strategic pattern. Tucker Carlson presents as a middle of the road commentator (like O’Reilly before him) who engages the public like a rational evangelist, persuading them to embrace the pro-liberty view. Sean Hannity is more like a daily briefer who re-summarizes the best talking points of the right, and mainly speaks to the choir. Then Laura Ingraham caps primetime by introducing some “new ground” to the liberty-friendly position. It makes for an impressive total block of effective political communication, far more organized than what is thrown at us nightly by CNN or MSNBC.

In LP circles, the “best practices” advocacy approach has often centered on defining a problem, summarizing the principle Libertarians believe in relation to it, offering a solution consistent with that principle, and explaining a way to transition or make “first steps” to achieve the solution. This works for engaging most reasonable people, and showing the party has a process in mind. But of course, what do you do when the public is not being led by reason (or, the rock)? Regular politicians usually lead by emotion (paper), which usually can only be won over via pain (or scissors). In the political game of Rock, Paper, Scissors, the way to overcome the COVID tyranny, and the laugh riots of controlled chaos, is to make their emotional tactics too painful to continue with. Ask a BLM supporter (example) if they really want their own kids to attend a protest. This is where the “do what we say, or you’re anti-science” emotional rhetoric meets pain, or the prospect of pain. The experts carrying water for the Dems want to promote their health nazi mantra on COVID while silently approving of the race protests, where all their rules are broken. The question about exposing their own kids to risk forces them to drop either their silence, or the COVID mask/distancing compliance shaming altogether. So, let’s stop this madness.

Liberty Hack #1—Effective Counter-Resistance

Given the above, the best method of confronting the Karenazis is to induce pain, to cut through the paper pushed by the mob and the swamp. Summary Game Plan:

1- Launch 10,000 lawsuits across the states against the lawless mandates. Put together a national crowdsourcing campaign to fund the litigation. It should get somebody’s attention. Result, somebody loses in court, or else loses a lot of time and money litigating. Ouch!
2- Promote a major turnaround in the next 60 days, due to COVID cases fading, school re-starting, Durham making announcements and indictments, and polls switching from being based on registered voters to likely voters–all of which will tighten the race up. Result, Trump wins—double ouch!
3- Do as “Dutchman” or “Sundance” and others have stated at the Conservative Treehouse, and regularly message Congress and the media that we will NOT stand idle and buy it this time, if/when massive election fraud happens in November, while the media tells us to just accept it as a “fair and square” outcome. Result, the fraud in the system gets exposed, and lots of guilty people might even go to jail—triple ouch!!

Resist Google, Vaccination, and the “New Normal’

Join Dr. Ron Paul, and Europe in rejecting the plandemic tyranny. Answer the COVID crisis mongers with pre-March 2020 common sense, geared to appeal to the common man. Mr. Main Street guy is getting tired of being manipulated, and he’s tired of the goose-stepping guilt-trippers. If he’s NOT eating burgers, and he’s living a healthy lifestyle, he is NOT the reason why others are sickly. He has a right to dissent from being a limitless support system for others who already have morbidites of various kinds. Stop stealing his liberty by demanding he virtue signal that he must be forced to conform to the new health welfare of mask wearing. Off your knees.

Masks are for hospitals, which are specially ventilated to supply more oxygen, to make up for the oxygen loss that is documented to happen when wearing masks. OSHA staff are some of the people verifying this, which is why they have regulations designating spaces that dip below 19% atmospheric oxygen as a health hazard that can lead to brain damage. And yes, the campaign to mandate masks is hopelessly political. The MSM, and tech giants like Google, Twitter et al have been brutal in enforcing the dogma. “Wear masks, or you’re selfish,” or “don’t have a dissenting view about masks, or you’re anti-science, or not taking it seriously” are emotional political narratives designed to chill debate, intimidate everyone into conformity, and manipulate people into normalizing their use. Those are political outcomes, and those who disagree with such tactics are entitled to oppose them. Note the government is even conducting advanced clinical trials on how to further shame or guilt trip people into compliance.

One other anti-crisis action is to firmly reassert one’s own commitment to health freedom by way of pursuing natural immunity, instead of aquiescence to being forcibly drugged. Resist the proported vaccines being developed (that really may only neutralize a strain of COVID-19 that has already mutated). Some plans are already on the table to expand no-fly lists to include those who refuse to wear masks, or to introduce “COVID PASS” fare technology to restrict your liberty right to travel if you haven’t had your Bill Gates injection. Consider signing a conscientious objector or better, a medical consent/refusal form, such as the one discussed by Bill Sardi. If you are healthy, trust your body to develop natural antibodies against the bug, as it has for 99% of the population. It’s called freedom, or “our body, our choice.” Point out the CDC has admitted more people have died under the lockdown from suicide or drug overdoses than from COVID. Don’t buy the unending emotional blackmail rhetoric (“comply, or you’ll kill grandma!”) of the self-serving alarmist health Karenazis, who think everybody should be forced to follow their unilateral protocols indefinitely. To not wear a mask is to reclaim your face, and your liberty. If somebody is sickly or high risk. let them wear a mask, or stay home. Fight off the mandated mask marauders!

As for the violence-friendly protests led by Black Lives Matter (BLM), openly fight back by likewise exposing their true political intent. Yes, their goal was always to find a way to hurt the economy, without really doing so, and aggravate the public’s sense of there being a loss of stability. This has been done in order to undermine public support for Trump, and set up a way to engineer election fraud in key states. The Dems mainly want to take Florida (lost by one point in 2016) and take back the three midwestern states. But the big secret is the BLM/Antifa assault on the country is starting to peter out. The momentum is fading as the Floyd death becomes a memory and arrests for monument destruction go up.

End the riots the way the Rodney King riots really ended, namely, when the Korean business owners, whose South Central LA buildings were being torched, got firearms and took sniper positions on the roof. A few warnings (or warning shots) later, the rioters scrambled away—no more protests, end of problem. Hey, THE SECOND AMENDMENT WORKS. Also, combat the monument topplers, who do not respect the ideological diversity or self-identified heritage of different regions of the country, by catching them in their own contradictions (which can be painfully embarassing). Imagine Trump announcing “in response to the attacks on past American heritage, by executive order I am nationalizing Confederate Flag Day, the Arkansas law signed by Bill Clinton.” Liberal heads explode in 5, 4, 3, …

Hack #2—Litigation

So, is there anybody else across all these blue states, with the money, time and will, to demand (under threat of starting a lawsuit) that their cities put up a counter street mural? The blue cities are likely lost, but it is easy to win a legal case for equal free speech, especially if done in federal courts where a straightforward constitutional case should prevail. Let BLM proceed with their painting plans, for example here in New York, IF they also permit Trump to paint “KEEP AMERICA GREAT” on the street next to Gracie Mansion, where the Mayor resides. Trump could even offer to pay for the paint and the laborers. If the Mayor refuses, sue him and NYC for not providing equal access for political speech (as Judicial Watch is preparing to do in DC).

There are other ways to legally fight back. It is illegal and actionable, for example, under the ADA to be denied equal access to a business if you have already said you have a medical condition. Even asking for details about that declared condition can be sufficient to produce a lawsuit. Walmart, Home Depot et al have had to walk back their announced mask mandates, in light of them being reminded of these litigation risks. Sadly, some cities and states are also creating fines for not wearing masks, or face diapers in public. The question is whether enough people will have the will to lawyer up to stop the mask shaming Karens, by taking them to court.

The path of litigation is much preferable to physically fighting another Revolution, especially considering the swamp is using the courts as one battle arena. It’s also harder for the media to negatively spin it as extremism if your victories are coming from the courts, including the Supreme Court of the US. That’s why the SCOTUS is one of the biggest battlegrounds. The issue for the SCOTUS swampers is ending the Trump presidency by running out the clock. Following one recent decision, Trump has to go back to DHS and get them to prepare a plan to end DACA that meets Justice John Roberts’ approval. For all practical purposes that can’t happen until after the election, and even then it will be months before the Court reviews the DACA plan again, which in turn will hold up the entire legislative reform of immigration, etc.

In effect, Roberts et al has invented a “Lawfare” judicial barrier to a conservative President getting anything done, even by EO. Anti -Trumpers will hyper-litigate and drag out each order in the courts for years, then the wrong kind of SCOTUS can rule “We don’t like the way you did this, start over.” But can Trump do the reverse, by creating an EO it will take future presidents years to reverse? If not, in this manner, Roberts has indeed gone full Lawfare. He has just given anti-Trumpers the green light to litigate every Trump policy into the ground, with the legal activists knowing there is a majority on the SCOTUS who may finally rule, “you didn’t cross every T in the admin process, so you can’t implement the policy, start over.” Any executive policy Obama wanted could be put into effect immediately, while everything Trump wants has to be subject to getting approved by a court process. The DACA decision runs out the clock on Trump doing anything on immigration reform with Congress until after the election, just like he can’t reform the Census process until after the election, can’t repeal Obamacare until after the election, etc, etc.

Overall, one of the biggest achievements of the Trump era is his tenanciousness in seeing all these legal battles through to a Supreme Court ruling (usually) in his favor. Upon re-election, Trump has four years of court victories at his back to support his policies, meaning he can now proceed to simply excecute them in a second term. The Lawfare crowd has burned through all their objections and legal maneuvers, so will not be able to block him for another entire term. And 200 conservative judicial appointments later, there are fewer and fewer liberal judges to block Trump’s EOs. Yet another reason why Dems are so desperate to get Trump out of there in November.

The Depth of the Rabbit Hole

The counter-resistance should also extend to continuing to expose the corruption of the would-be elite controllers, both recent past, and present. I believe ZeroHedge broke down some weeks ago how the Obama regime was extensively surveilling all the leading GOP candidates in 2015-2016, or even earlier, using the resources of CIA, FBI etc. When Trump clearly became the presumptive nominee by spring 2016, surveillance of his campaign was stepped up. This was all profoundly illegal, so to cover their tracks, they decided in mid 2016 to find cover to make it seem legal, using the FISA court process and Steele dossier. After Trump’s election, this process was rolled into a full coup attempt (by outgoing Obama/Biden staff and anti-Trump swamp loyalists) to oust the new President, in order to further the cover-up of Spygate. General Michael Flynn knows much about this and other Obama corruption, so that’s why they tried to entrap him and dirty him up, and have kept him under gag order by the judge. They don’t want the gag order lifted on Flynn, as they don’t want him talking before the election. They don’t want Flynn to be in position to sue anybody over this before the election, if ever. Ultimately, they wanted to get him stuck in jail so he could be swiftly Epsteined.

Flynn is already exonerated, minus the formality of the judge dismissing the case as he has been ordered to do. The main difference in the Stone case is ‘Judging Amy’ denied his motions to admit evidence of a corrupt process, or to make any arguments about the corrupt handling of his case, and put a gag order on Stone on top of that. The judge in the Flynn case did allow that, which is the main reason why his attorney Sydney Powell was able to dig up all the corruption evidence. If that had not been allowed, we STILL would not have known about how Flynn was set up, had been entrapped, etc.

The similar corruption involved in railroading Stone will not be known until he gets his second trial, and I expect it will be more massive than in the Flynn case. Judge Sullivan is trying to drag things out with Flynn (by now requesting a full appellate review) until past the election, like the rest of the swamp. It’ll be much harder to drag things out for four YEARS if Trump is reelected. Hence the frenzy we are seeing by the swamp to hold the lid down on their trash can through November 3. The hope, in whatever happens, is that the indictments to be announced before the election will be the first set of indictments, and that more of them (including counts against Obama) will be issued after the election. Barr and Durham are simply dotting the I’s and crossing the T’s to make sure they will be solid enough to prevent the slippery swamp weasels from getting out of them.

The heads of the Obama era CIA, DNI, FBI, and Crowdstrike have all stated under oath they found NO evidence of Russian collusion with the Trump campaign. The Mueller probe concluded the same after 2 more years of investigating. Nonetheless, the coup plotters and their swamp acolytes have continued to try to to re-try Trump and his team over the phantom scandal, including the tainted presecutions of Flynn and Roger Stone. During a July 28 hearing, AG Barr was visibly more intense and irritated when answering questions about Stone, as he clearly had not taken Stone’s or Trump’s side as far as his arrest, indictment or conviction goes. Yet the Dems still accused Barr of bias. Tells you what you need to know about their intentions—which are to ruin anybody who even partially supported Trump and his allies.

Compare the drummed up process prosecutions of Russiagate to the scandals of yesteryear. I’m old enough to remember Clinton was found to have lied to two different judges besides the Special Prosecutor Ken Starr, then was held in contempt and disbarred. Real crimes, not just process. But in the case of the Clintons, past and present, the Deep State cleans up after its own. The Special Prosecutor was a swamper who tried hard to cover up for Clinton on Whitewater (for example, his lead investigator found evidence of a second bullet wound to Vince Foster from a different caliber gun, but covered it up anyway). There were over 40 different Clinton scandals at that time, by his White House’s own count (as reported when I ran as the LP candidate against against Hillary for Senate in 2000). Starr used a vacuum to scoop up all the evidence on each of those fronts, to send then down into the black hole called his “investigation,” precisely in order to cover it up. He was accused of exactly this by several of his investigator team members, and the media buried that info too. There was so much slime, no wonder it took 6 years. That tradition of elite cover-up continues to the Epstein/Maxwell scandals of today.

Prosecute Soros and the Coup Elite

In light of more people exposing the legal money laundering op BLM has been doing for the DNC via Act Blue, it has deftly switched its funnel to the Tides Foundation, yet another organ controlled by the Soros network. This may not be the last time the funding ball bounces from one Soros entity to another. Whatever the funding sources or pathway, SOMEBODY on the RECEIVING end at the DNC is making decisions about who the collected money gets disbursed to. The Trump DOJ should start a probe, and the (supposedly) GOP-run Senate should run hearings to investigate how this prominent loophole to the campaign finance laws operates, and exactly who these recipients are.

BLM and Antifa have been so noisy and visible in its mayhem that it has drawn lots of attention to its financial machinations and connections. Their criminal actions may be converted into prosecutions that include putting Soros in the crosshairs as an accessory, in ways he and they can’t wiggle out from. As a theatrical gesture, for now, I suggest people print out a picture of Soros, with the news headline about his pouring 220 million into BLM, and put it in your pocket. If you then run into a discussion with somebody about the BLM activists, you can take out the pix and point out that the true face of Black Lives Matter, is that of a white Hungarian fat cat.

Antifa is being treated as a domestic terrorist organization by the US, in lieu of there being controversy as to whether they can be legally declared as such. It’s actually a good thing that it’s problematic to label a domestic political group “terrorist” with the same ease as when we designate foreign based entities as such. Otherwise, imagine how the Democrats, if back in full control of Congress or the White House, would categorize all manner of conservative groups as “terrorists.” What Project Veritas has now done is establish a money trail from Soros to the violent rioters, which is enough to get him indicted for aiding and abetting them individually in terrorist activity. This means he or any Soros Europe-based org can now be legally declared a foreign terrorist, and other orgs he has helped in the US can be investigated as connected to foreign based terrorism. Long way around, but we got him.

Barack Obama, AKA Barry Soetoro (you know, the guy who says he’s from Hawaii, but has a Connecticut SSN), like Soros, ultimately answers to the Deep State, and his operations should be the next overlord regime to be exposed. On the constitutional surface, “advisor” Valerie Jarrett was a surrogate of Obama, and Obama was the top dog. In terms of the Deep State structure, however, it seems more clear O was/is a middle manager, while Jarrett was/is his handler and superior. Jarrett was the architect of Spygate under orders from chief swamper John Brennan, and O is the functionary who carried it out.  Jarrett notably evaded or failed to answer directly questions about this very issue, when recently interviewed. It would be nice, following John Durham’s announcement of his findings, if umpteen people were indicted on multiple counts, and O was named as an unindicted co-conspirator on most of the counts. People could then count up all the counts O was NOT being indicted on, and go “wow…” If that happens, I believe the wait will have been worth it. One caveat is, after all this time, any indictments announced ought to be airtight, given the amount of time Durham has had to prepare them.

Before the declassification and court victories by advocacy groups like Judicial Watch, many of these disclosures were only exposed by means of discussions by the Q movement, a group that has for years openly gone over coded questions posted by a certain insider person or group (General Flynn, perhaps?) who hints that legal doomsday is coming for the coup plotters. Those Deep State operators, inevitably, have been trying to infiltrate Q from the beginning, and poison pill it with anti-semitic, or false white hat messages. Then to cover their tracks, they are making it look like the bad messaging is coming from Russians. But why is there all this negative attention and massive censorship of QAnon, if it’s just a secretive kookoo outlier cult, or misinformation operation? Perhaps, to deflect from the reality that it’s not.

Q, based on the large number of confirmed predictions or “Q proofs,” has consistently been providing overall good info, allowing people to collectively judge it as such, by having them research and openly discuss the questions it raises for themselves. That is the opposite of secrecy. The attempt to smear it as unreliable is the psyop, easily playing on the egos of armchair would-be debunkers, who only trust corporate sources of information. The MSM despises QAnon and has repeatedly tried to deeply bury it since 2017, precisely because they can’t control it. In fact, the swamp’s relentless attack pattern to discredit Q (associate it with extremist groups) follows the exact same pattern they used on the Tea Party, and most recently on alternative social media. How about we review its assertions directly by ourselves, instead of having to wade through hundreds of hit pieces in the search results to find a pro-Q source? Why not Trust Trump, as Q has often advised, in that he may have sleeper supporters of his own, that look like they are swampers, but are in the end loyal to Trump? That’s been the point behind Q’s suggestion to also trust Trump surrogates, and to not be surprised if it turns out some of them were pretending to be Deep Staters on his behalf. 4-D chess, and all that.

Hack  #3—Call Out the GOP Version of “Well, the Other Guy’s Worse”

This is a campaign between a Democratic establishment candidate hiding in the basement, versus a Republican establishment hiding in the basement. The RINOs and Never Trumpers in DC, and in particular in the US Senate, have been no-shows in assisting the President in implementing policies or fighting the media’s relentless attempts at dominating the narrative. And even so-called ‘freedom conservatives’ have often come up short in fighting these battles, and so must also be called out. Look at the evasions of one such animal, blaming Democrats for Republican failures to make progress:

Jordan has an abrasive style of confronting the swamp that reminds many of Trump, and he has been admired by many of those supporters as a possible successor to him in future cycles. But he has taken money from Google, et al social media special interests. So if even the best or most effective of conservatives is sucking off the teat of the tech giants, exactly what is going to change? Exactly what is he going to do in the last months of the 2020 election campaign that will meaningfully effect the outcome? That’s what Tucker (and Lucas) wanted to know in this exchange, as do I.

Hack #4—Shut the Window

The last hack, if followed in conjunction with the above, can transition us not only back to true normal, but also to the smaller, minimal state that best maximizes liberty. If mob radicals can try to move the mainstream window in their direction, constitutionalists can put up a scrap to move it the other way, or even shut the window to keep the destructive propaganda out. I’ve already suggested leaving behind both the mainstream media (MSM) and the newer tech giants of social media, who are pushing the same dogmas and cultural cancelmania. But what about mainstream academia, and its entry level source of indoctrination, public (AKA government) schools? Well, we can piggy back on the recent lockdown and riots to find a better way:

Steer Education Back to Private, and Steer Defund Rhetoric to Smaller Government

As I said about Congresswoman AOC’s rhetorical call for eliminating ICE, as a matter strictly of viewing eliminating bureaucracies as a good thing, a libertarian could actually support transferring the legitimate role of law enforcement in protecting citizens to other entities that could do the job. A libertarian version of “defunding the police” would be to transfer law enforcement duties to sheriffs and US Marshalls wherever that was logistically possible around the US. Where extreme population densities make that impossible, don’t defund or eliminate police forces, as sometimes, when a deputy discovers an MS-13 headquarters, Andy Taylor and Barney Fife just won’t be able to cut it, simple as that.

But the bigger prize of the last few months has been the inadvertant experiment the mass public has had with home schooling their children during the COVID lockdown. The experiment has allowed us to see both the benefits and problems of not leaning on the government schools, such as 1) yes, people have found they can make arrangements to get things done to manage their kids’ home education, and 2) online learning is not the bed of high tech roses its advocates often make it out to be. It turns out teaching and studying at home requires discipline and commitment, that the mere availability of a TV or computer screen by itself may not provide. But big picture, most found they can do it. Going forward, based on this concrete “withdrawal experience” America has just had living without public schools, they can more readily engage the libertarian concept of leaving the government-run education racket behind.

2020 Electoral Map and Predictions

You may note the adjoining US electoral map is the same one I posted at this time exactly four years ago (August 3, 2016), when I projected Trump would win by at least 289 electoral votes. The only states I got wrong were Wisconsin (I thought Hillary would squeak it out) and Utah, which I called for the LP’s Gary Johnson since he was actually leading or competitive in that state at that point. This time I am predicting basically the same map outcome, but Utah goes Trump, and I have the same call for the big three midwest swing states (Trump will win at least 2 out of 3 of them). I won’t be surprised if he comes out with over 300 electoral votes.

To Dems, all that matters is winning Florida (lost by 1% in 2016) and at least two of the midwestern states Hillary lost in 2016, that Democrats otherwise “always win” (such as Michigan, which Trump won by just 18,000 votes). They believe that’s doable, or the easiest points to manufacture enough election fraud to get the 270+ electoral vote result they want. So they are not neglecting the midwest this time, and hope they can hold the line everywhere else. Wall St., the financial arm of the Deep State, is showering the Dems with cash to ensure this result. The wild cards are new or additional “surprise battleground states” that should emerge for Trump, just like last time. 

The current fallacious polling echoes 2016, and has been part of the mousetrap process—use of inaccurate survey methodology to demoralize the Trump support base, to discourage it from turning out, and to set up confirmation of the false numbers via election fraud (courtesy of an expanded mail-in vote, where “extra votes” can be generated on demand). Like four years ago, the polls before Labor Day are badly sampled, weakly screened (registered voters) and therefore meaningless. Only the polls in the fall, screened for likely voters who are actually paying attention, are the polls that matter. And by then, the Durham findings (including indictments) will also be out. so I fully expect a turnaround in a few weeks (against the swamp establishment forces) in the polls, and the same result for the outsider trend in November as in 2016, namely victory.


Mousetraps, Election Flaps and Freedom Scraps, Part 1

Posted on Updated on

As the unending attempts to topple populist liberty have drastically devolved from shampeachment, to a failed plannedemic, now to laugh riots over the course of the lockdown months, all I see are traps set by various plotters, including some that have been exposed, and others that have backfired in spectacular fashion upon their perpetrators. So many such plots, in fact, that I’ll have to take two shots at this apple, to make a pie.

All the traps accomplished, in the end, has been to further unravel the credibility and fatally expose the machinations of the Deep State, as it flails about to desperately avoid the doomsday coming to the elite establishment in November. Recent polls that sample likely voters show Trump ahead in 10 battleground states as of this writing—motivating the trappers to stay even more busy. One conspicuous example of the attempt to box-in Trump has been the negligent handling of a crime explosion (by numerous big-city Mayors) following the race-based “protests” of the last two months. Attempts by the President to offer additional personnel to help stop or curb the discord (that has totalled $1.4 Billion in property damage, over 10,000 arrested, and over 700 injuries or deaths to police officers, and non-violent bystanders) have been designated as “fomenting violence” by “Trump the tyrant” (according to these Mayors, and especially by House Speaker Nancy ‘Nazi’ Pelosi).

Nazi’s comment was a canned response that leading Democrats were ALWAYS planning to launch, upon Trump bringing in federal law enforcement or troops. Portland (among other cities) has been under riot seige for weeks, but if Trump had waited months before he acted, they would have still spun it as a reckless Nazi move on his part. Trump was wise to have kept his powder dry. He may have been using Portland as a test case to confirm this theory about what bad narrative the swamp would roll out about his taking action.

Here’s one famous movie example of how traps (in this case a slew of Venus fly traps) can come around to grimly do in the smuggest of bullies and authoritarians, if you can handle the horror elements:

Covid Ops, & Racist Props: the Double Mousetrap

By far, the most successful trap laid for the populist movement has been the Virus FlyTrap, constructed and expanded to emotionally shame us into ongoing, indeed indefinite, no-back-talk compliance with undemocratic decrees from the Health Authoritarians, and other control freaks. They took a temporary advisory put out by the White House in March that was only supposed to last 2-3 weeks, and turned it into an “endless march” into mandated servitude to support “slowing the spread,” a crusade that has now been extended until a vaccine is concocted. Anytime anybody pushes against the standard COVID narrative, they’re accused of “not taking the outbreak seriously.” Some commentators like Trish Regan of FOX Business got canned for suggesting there were politics or unseen entities behind the plannedemic, or “crisis” push. It’s been a few tough months, for speaking the unguarded truth.

The “where’s your mask” social shaming has been specifically as vile as it gets, as a healthy 99% of the public has been unconstitutionally commanded to wear this germophobic totem if they dare to get out more. It acts to signify their obedience to a “new norm,” to supposedly protect the mere 1% at actual high risk of death, due to their own pre-existing health issues. The only masks unreconstructed, truly pro-liberty people should consider as “must wear” are Guy Fawkes/V for Vendetta masks. I suggest, people should get inside more, and read up on the informed dissent on the virus madness, including research from Ivy League trained doctors.

The internet still stands for freedom and dissent, if you take a few minutes to look around it—but I can’t hyperlink everything. Do a DuckDuckGo search for well-reasoned, non-emotionally manipulative articles like the following: ‘Observing Elites Manipulate Our Fear: COVID-19, Propaganda and Knowledge’, ‘Corona: creating the illusion of a pandemic through diagnostic tests’, ‘12 Experts Questioning the Coronavirus Panic’, ‘Can We Trust the WHO?’, ‘How deadly is the coronavirus? It’s still far from clear’, ‘Perspectives on the Pandemic II: A Conversation with Dr. Knut Wittkowski,’ and many more. Also check out Laura Ingraham’s excellent video commentaries on the dubious “science” and legality of mask mandates.

The parties pushing the plannedemic are not “unseen entities.” They are quite visible “global reset” promoters like Bill Gates (who has a heavy financial investment in the vaccine drugs in development), Dr. “it’s always getting worse!” Anthony Fauci, or WHO executives (funded by China, and a certain Hungarian billionaire, etc). Most of this set covered up the extent of the outbreak in China, and pushed conflicting messages about the virus to make leaders like Trump look bad, as well as set him up to not be re-elected. Let people be free to get a second medical opinion about masks and distancing, and to follow that advice at their own risk or benefit. You do NOT have an open-ended obligation to be a support system for somebody else’s failing health condition—if they are high risk, let them wear a mask, and stay home. Introducing force on everybody else (via health decrees that may have no basis in law, in the first place) is not the way to solve this, or any other problem. So I think, your body, your choice, as they say on other issues.

When Trump started to “re-open” months ago, he should have appointed a seperate team of virus experts who were also pro-economic relaunch, to act as a respected “second opinion” to Dr. Fauci and Dr Birx (also known as, ‘Falsy and Scarfy’). Then he would have been able to dump the first team without the swamp labeling him as “ignoring the scientists” or acting recklessly. Right now we seem to be stuck with Fauci as our top “authority” for staying shut down. But Scarfy and Falsy do give Trump great left cover, for having a role of only temporary importance. Each time the swamp has tried to mount the narrative that Trump is not following the advice of the experts, he dispatches the two to go up to the microphone and admit Trump is constantly consulting them, and heeding their advice. Stops the drumbeat every time.

In sum, the swamp took advantage of the virus outbreak and lockdown precisely because 1) it temporarily damaged the economy, so Trump couldn’t use it as an issue, and 2) it made holding mass events more complicated, so they could argue Trump shouldn’t hold rallies. Put together, it was designed to mousetrap the President into a no-win situation where, no matter what he did, his response would be characterized as a fail, and allow Speaker Nancy Pelosi to declare the whole outbreak as “the Trump virus.” Okay, GOP, you control the Senate. Nazi Pelosi has spoken, now it’s your turn. So when are the Senate hearings planned, to investigate the true origins of the virus outbreak, the actual facts about how accurate the tests are, and China’s role in the coverup?

These machinations have blunted overt support for Trump (as designed) to the point where the very existence of a winning coalition has been described in terms of “secret voters,” if they remain there at all. But meanwhile, the swamp’s strategy will prove increasingly untenable, as more and more of the country returns to a normal routine through the rest of the summer. The remaining lockdowns will look more and more out of place, unjustified, tyrannical and excessive compared to most of the states. Eventually the lockdown protocol will be perceived everywhere as an overreaction to the pandemic. The next 3-4 weeks will be crucial, as the spate of COVID infections subsides, and everybody gets a sense of “all clear” as of mid to latter August (at that point COVID will be ‘over,’ at least according to this Stanford professor, with a degree from Cambridge). When Trump then starts to hold rallies again en masse, and it becomes clear again that he can get thousands to show up for him on short notice everywhere around the country, talk about his “secret voters” will simply go away.

The Race to Race Politics

Despite its domination of our way of life since March, even the Lockdown hasn’t toppled Trump, soooo, back to fomenting race riots. The protests seemed to start up as if on queue, with the single police brutality incident involving a white cop (lethally) putting his knee on suspect George Floyd in Minneapolis. I wouldn’t be surprised if the suspect cop himself was paid off to set this in motion (somebody, please check his, or his family’s bank accounts). Upon catastrophic damage resulting from protests over this, the trap seems to have been for the swamp Mayors to plead for Trump to come in with troops, then blame any “Kent State” violence that results from that on him. The President’s response has been in effect blunt. “Don’t pass the buck and dump this mess in my lap. The voters hired you to deal with your city. I’m a remote back-up from Washington, but I am prepared to send in the National Guard, troops and other personnel if you can’t do your job.” When Trump didn’t get lured into the trap, the Mayors took the opposite track, and now say they don’t want the feds to come in, and “worsen the problem.” The incident pattern nonetheless served as the pretext for the avalanche of protests, riots, statue-toppling and street murals that rapidly rolled out thereafter—again, as if on queue, to garner black votes.

Or put another way: 5-6% of the black vote from 2008/2012 stayed home in 2016. This allowed Trump to win several close state races. The Dems are desperate to get that vote to come back out in 2020, so they have been trying to smoke them out with race riots, and four years of “Trump is racist” rhetoric. When Biden invoked the epithet by calling him the first racist President, he apparently forgot about the 12 prior Presidents who clearly pushed racist statements or policies. Did the swamp actually think Hillary was entitled to every black vote her husband got? Did they not realize Hillary was simply less appealing to black voters than Obama, and so she should be happy Dems got even 88% of their vote last time? And do they not realize they only got 88% of that vote despite Michelle, Barack, Hillary, Bill and the entire media all heavily campaigning and pushing for Hillary in 2016?

“Black Lives Matter” the saying or motto, is a widely popular and unifying sentiment, but BLM the organization is basically a psyop, and a confusing one at that, since several of their utterances sound identical to that of the KKK. This professional left, Marxist or Communist activist group has appropriated the BLM phrase for decidedly divisive and chaotic purposes. And yet, the fundraising page on its website serves as a fundraising pump for Act Blue, which uses such groups to legally launder money (including donations from overseas) to the Democratic National Committee, for distribution to various mainstream Democratic candidacies and groups. What is sorely needed are more exposes by Veritas, or Judicial Watch of the funding sources of both Antifa and Black Lives Matter, that show these protest events have a common major benefactor (Soros, DNC, Gates or whomever). This would prove that the “peaceful” group was in fact acting as cover for the violent group, as per a plan coordinated by the same mega donor bosses. It would be particularly sweet if the Mr. Untouchables (billionaires Soros, Steyer, Gates) were duly exposed by such a probe, as the difficulty with going after fat cats like Soros has always been, who’s going to investigate and prosecute him? His bought and paid for DAs? His bought and paid for politicians? We will soon find out.

At any rate, the research data should put an end to the wholesale defamation of the voting electorate that produced the populist, outsider victories of 2016. According to the Wikipedia articles on the KKK and neo-Nazis, there are only about 3,000-6,000 white supremacists in the US, in total (depending on whether you believe the ADL’s or the SPLC’s estimates). There is no reason for a country of 330 million people to be paranoid about the influence of 6,000 people. Small wonder then, that Dems have tried to get a new round of sex smears against Trump and other non-liberals ready in the batter’s box, just in case the small amount of actual racists around gets more widely exposed.

Those small numbers can in no way be controlling the entire base right of the US, any more than Antifa controls the entire left. It is another hilarious baiting attempt by white left propagandists who are racially smearing half of the country, in order to scare black voters back into coming out to vote for Democrats in November. And they do this every four years. Their demagogic scramble reached its pinnacle by spring, when Biden famously declared to his presumably kept plantation that “if you don’t vote for me, then you ain’t black.” This has naturally angered more than a few independent-minded black progressives (warning, some bad language): 

The end goal of the Dem leadership is to resolve the race/gender issues of campaign 2020 they have themselves stoked by having Biden appoint either Hillary or (perhaps more likely, Michelle Obama) as his running mate. Which means if Biden picks her and wins, Michelle will be the acting President, serving the ‘CEO’ way Dick Cheney did for GWB. Which also means, Barack will be the actual President, serving through his proxy wife. The Clintons and the Obamas have been fighting for dominant control of the Democratic party since 2008, and this will finally resolve the matter. Look for Biden to then resign in February or March 2023, just past two years into office, so Michelle can then serve through 2024, and be eligible to run in both 2024 and 2028, for ten years as President. H A Goodman is perpetually going even further, and claims Biden will drop out of the race in 2020, to be replaced by Hillary.  Eeeeww.

So it always is with major party politicians and the black or female vote, with former always virtue signalling to the latter. And this is as true of the GOP as it is of the Dems. E,g., when the Charleston Church shootings happened, certain craven, unprincipled Swamp Republicans like then Gov. Nikki Haley (along with Mitt Romney) were the first to cave when the cultural left authoritarians used the tragedy to start the drumbeat to take down the Confederate flag. She caved almost immediately, just as she would cave to the current Philistines, who are clamoring to take down monuments to figures who had nothing to do with the Civil War. The only thing neocons like Haley will hold fast and firm on is pushing for more military intervention, and a default confrontational approach towards any country not in lockstep alliance with the US. To most such hack pols, the point is to ride whatever emotional wave will keep them in a position of power or influence.

As the BLM protest stunts have shown, a little anarchy can disrupt this two-party virtue strip dance.  But what if the street theatre went both ways? Imagine if a team of people literally started dropping blue “paint bombs” (in support of reasonable law enforcement) on the BLM street murals. Half a dozen folks controlling drones, that can release blue paint over the mural (or at least over the word black) in the middle of the night, might be all that’s needed to change the message, and the narrative. Then watch the gasps of outrage from the other side—“Omigosh, they’re destroying property, distorting OUR message, and violating legal procedures! Rule of Law! Oh the humanity! These peasants must be ruled, by our law.”

Such anarchy activism will require the emergence of some conscientious objectors who act as populist martys fighting PC bullies, who do so to expose (by their arrest and condemnation) the selective punishment afforded to those who deface “public property” in a way that displeases both the mob, and the Total State. As I posted five years ago, “…the whole “rule of law” canard is a one-way scam to pistol whip and punish the cultural right, but never, ever, the PC factions for stressing states rights, [and] is part of what is fueling a rebellion by the “little people” against the whole establishment racket, as displayed in the current Presidential primary season.” 

MeToo & Collusion Voodoo: The Twin Towers Collapse

It took long enough, but with no new investigations of Trump going on (to be used to charge him with obstruction if he interfered), it seems we are finally getting the declass. And it’s exposing everything we always expected it would. The disclosures in mid spring disposed of the Russian collusion accusations even more thoroughly than it already had been before, leading to the exonoration of set up targets Lt. General Michael Flynn, and even more recently justified the full commutation afforded to political operator Roger Stone. The final collapse of the witchhunt paralleled the inability of the swamp to re-crank up sex charges against selected populists, since any such new smear campaign would revive the issue of Biden’s inappropriate behavior with children, as well as the Tara Reade assault allegations he barely escaped scrutiny over. The twin towers of scandal mongering have indeed collapsed.

Fun and games. It was revealed Flynn was set-up for entrapment even after FBI agents had concluded he had done nothing improper (a conclusion that was overruled by the 7th Floor at the FBI (i.e., Strzok, McCabe, Comey). It now appears, for example, a certain ‘Agent Doe’ who was monitoring MI6 agent Chrisopher Steele as he assembled the famous Russian sex dossier, was set-up to be a “show handler” for Steele, who had his own separate supervision coming from elsewhere in the Deep State. So IF anybody asked about this later, Steele or the op (from the “official” handler side) would look as clean as a whistle. But who’s minding this store? Who approved of lying to a federal FISA judge, entrapping people, using an opposition candidate research document as if it was credible intel, fraudulently submitting it in court as evidence, etc? As Mark Levin has noted, we’re supposed to believe there was a rogue FBI, a rogue DOJ, a rogue CIA, etc, etc where these things were going on, but Obama was no where to be seen, not in charge, not overseeing, or receiving briefings on any of this?

It’s more accurate to suppose he and Biden were approving the corruption, just as declassified notes from his White House in its final weeks have revealed. Moveover, the flow of the events indicate Obama was quite used to clandestine smear ops by intel staff to destroy his opponents, and to puff himself up. I get the impression OBarry was, and is, a CIA swamp functionary, who had his paperwork massaged to build him into the shell figure they needed to get full control of the White House. He is a middle manager at best in the Deep State scheme of things, not a top dog, regardless of the official title he held. O’s handler, John Brennan, is probably the real honcho who called the shots in Russiagate, including picking who to set up and ruin. O just carried out the swamp’s scheme.

This election is a battle not between Democrats and Republicans, but between the populist outsiders who gained a measure of power in 2016, versus the swamp authoritarians who want it back ASAP. In that light past and present attempts to oust elected Presidents are not new, or isolated outrages. E.g., Watergate was a coup plot led by White House Counsel John Dean (a swamper seeking revenge over Nixon for removing Hoover at the FBI). Dean mousetrapped Nixon out of office by first orchestrating the break-in, then advised the President to cover up the Administration’s connection to it. This made it easy for he and Felt to then leak info the press, and eventually to testify at hearings about the coverup he himself had fomented. It didn’t start with Obamagate. The swamp wants to box or mousetrap itself into permanent control, at all times, and it is furious the Trump exception ever happened.

There Goes the Judge

In the case of the Supreme Court, it’s the same as it ever was. Four years ago, we had 4.5 conservative justices (four consistent, and one swing vote), 4.5 liberal justices, with 3-5 justices at the point of retiring, and today, it’s basically the same deal. The next elected President will be in position to nominate several justices, and pivot the balance of the court for generations. Lost in all the events of June, the Supreme Court also cleared former NJ Governor Christie over the Bridgegate matter in a 9-0 decision. It appears many up and coming GOP figures in the tri-state metro area “coincidentally” got targeted for Flynn-style set-up investigations by Obama-era prosecutors.

In the crucial latter June SCOTUS rulings, Trump appeared to win most of the key decisions (except the obligatory social liberal activism, with the gay special rights ruling). This includes the “do it over” decision regarding Trump’s repeal of Obama’s DACA executive order—it only delays Trump’s winning on the issue later, while temporarily pleasing his daughter Ivanka and Jared Kushner. While Jarvanka’s influence is part of it, the real point of his new DACA proposal is to reposition Trump’s immigration strategy in light of the SCOTUS decision. Following a court victory he was going to take the end of the DACA EO to use it as leverage in the battle to get full immigration reform. Without it he has to change the plan, by partially embracing the DACAs, but defining the treatment of them falling along the lines of his reform.

The Swamp Congress and judges want to run out the clock on the Trump adminstration, in order to swiftly junk his EOs, but it increasingly appears the Donald will escape the mousetrap by prevailing in November.  So the Dems will still have to contend with addressing full legislative reform on immigration, both to defeat his policy, and to head off a deeper defeat later, when he re-submits the repeal of the DACA EO in a way that SCOTUS accepts.

Social Media Distancing

The “tech giants”—Facebook, Twitter, Google/YouTube, Amazon etc, have also tried to box in Trump. The harshest way they have taken to do this has been to ban, shadow ban, strike, or “demonetize” sites or accounts not to their liking, 95% of which “just happen” to be pro-Trump. The plan is, to ensnare even highly regarded right leaning sites or channels (like the Federalist) into their “you violated our commuunity standards” policy traps, and thereby deprive voters from hearing alternative voices, right at election time. The giants feel like they can get away with this due to certain regulations, and because they have much of Congress essentially bought and paid for.

The Federalist people should have seen it coming. The censors got rid of the sharper and smaller alternative sources first, so now they are looking at the bigger fish to fry. If the new Big Corporate had its way, everybody online would be just talking about viral cat pictures or food choices, and nothing that could challenge the current order. The larger right sites should have pushed back when the tech giants went after Milo or Alex Jones. The “public square” or platform status of the tech giants means the companies cannot act as publishers or editors, period. The government (Communications Decency Act, section 230) gave them “public platform” status, so under that status it can tell them to stop acting as publishers, i.e. stop censoring or shadow banning political speech.

The entire “it’s a private sector company” argument is pseudo-libertarian misdirection, as the issue is the abuse of their public platform status, which subjects them to government regulation and shields them from liability. With the stroke of a pen, Trump could, by executive order, suspend the tech giants’ CDA section 230 protections from liability, pending a formal investigation of their political bias, and election interference. Then those giants could finally be brought to heel. If these firms don’t like the regulatory framework, they should call for the repeal of CDA altogether (i.e., less regulation, the cleanest libertarian solution), then resolve to be the publishers they have already acted as, and thereby accept the same libel or liability risks of any other online publisher.

While we’re at it ridding ourselves of nonsense or over-protected tech platforms like Falsebook and Twatter, let’s support alternative platforms like Parler, Minds, and Bitchute, which permit its contributors to publish and monetize their content. Platforms like Gab now get much of its revenue from Bitcoin, direct bank transfer payments and other methods that bypass the corporate/deep state gestapo. This then circumvents one of the main tactics used to “cancel” dissent and alternative culture. When they tried to shut down Wikileaks, for example, they also sought to disable Assange’s Visa and Mastercard accounts. It’s Mark of the Beast time.

Jo Jo to the Rescue?

These events have been the backdrop for the mighty response of the Libertarian Party, which has been (emphasis on forward-looking, or on ‘has been’?) to nominate Clemson University Professor of Psychology Jo Jorgensen as its 2020 candidate for President. My brief comment about her (for now) is that while she will ably represent the standard Libertarian vision for the country as party members understand it and our principles, she does not have it in her to effectively confront the political establishment (AKA, the cult of the omnipotent state) and the media obstacles put up to marginalize, box-in, or block alternative candidates. Her story:

The problem (as I have identified before) is Libertarians most often want to play patty-cake with the so-called mainstream powers that be, while that establishment always plays for keeps (just ask the late Mr. Epstein, for example). Worse, our candidates (with inspiring exceptions such as freedom warriors like Adam Kokesh) have never appreciated the achievement of outsiders in showing what it takes to confront the enemy. Listen to her summary dismissal of Trump’s first four years, and his supporters:

“I would tell them, you voted last time, sometimes for the first time or first time in 20 years, because you were tired of the same old politicians and wanted something different. But he got into office and acted like all the others. He said he’d cut government size and instead it’s bigger; he said he’d get rid of the deficit and he’s going in the other direction. You wanted something new and [a Libertarian] is something new, not just another big government spender.” 

This is a critique of Trump as per whether his views are coherently libertarian (which they are not), without a reference to how well he’s combatted the institutional barriers to liberty. On that front, there have been many victories. This is also another way of saying, Jorgensen herself has no plan for dealing with fighting the statist establishment, and worse, does not recognize that there is a fight to be fought. How will liberty prevail without Jo having a strategy for that? Does she have a plan to reach working class voters? A way to overcome a media blackout? Or money in the hundreds of millions, to fight the blackout? Does she understand Trump made some progress on these fronts? And so on–I’ll review more of Jo’s campaign in the next post. But at first glance I’d say: Get back, Jo Jo, to Clemson Universary, get back to where you once belonged.

As the Election Clock Flaps, Flips and Flops

The next few months until election day will be a race to see who brings down who first. The swamp wants to get rid of Trump in the election, so they can shut down all the investigations of the FISA abuse, whistleblower process abuse, etc before the culprits go to trial. I’m thinking Trump will beat them to it by timing the announcement of prosecutions for late summer or early fall, exposing and enumerating their crimes for all to see during the campaign. Rasmussen just came out with a poll (once again, based on likely voters, not merely registered people) showing it’s more like Trump and Biden are within the margin of error. Rasmussen (down the stretch in October) was one of the only polls in 2016 that were accurate in this regard, so I’d trust them over the swamp polls this time as well.

We already see his timing at work by the news about firing Deep State controlled attorneys and Inspectors Generals (Atkinson, et al), and re-taking control of the COVID-19 coverage by resuming the daily briefings, or by strategically commuting the sentence of Roger Stone to late on a Friday night, which limited the impact of critical reaction by the liberal media. The usual suspects can complain all they want, the regular public isn’t paying attention to a weekend commutation or firing. Perhaps Trump is telling them “this is what you get” for talking about starting up yet another partisan weaponized investigation against him (now over his handling of the outbreak), and that he won’t be bullied.

The other side has not been idle. Certified Deep Staters (Republican division) like Rep. Liz Cheney are also said to be working quietly to remove Freedom Caucus conservatives from positions of influence. Neocons/RINOs are never content to just have a voice in politics, they are always trying to purge everybody else. She’s just another cog in the wheel of the GOP-swamp plan of waiting to fully take back over DC if Trump loses, and to resume control as if nothing happened. It’s all about the next three months, all of swamp DC is waiting out Trump in order to get back to “swamp normal” after his defeat. Then the RINOs won’t have to cooperate with the build-a-wall deplorabes and populists anymore. Senator Turtle (Mitch McConnell) knows if he helps too many Trumpites win Senate seats, they might vote him out as Majority Leader. Can’t have that!

The same applies to the swamp dominated bureaucracy. Even after four years, it’s STILL not Trump’s DOJ or FBI, it’s the swamp’s DOJ/FBI—slow walking data and probes on Seth Rich and the Clinton emails for four years, and counting, to cite just one example. Given the corrupt state of the DC courts, DOJ, etc, most of the guilty parties would be acquitted if they were indicted before this point, thus what would have been the point of prosecuting them? So in the meantime, part of Trump’s next best approach has been to let the swamp fully expose themselves, from the coup plotters to the MSM, to Bolton to Fauci, then get them removed from power. It has not been a mistake free operation, but it has been working.

A man with a normal ego would have been crushed long ago, by all the relentless pressure the Deep State has put upon him. For better or worse, as I have urged for years, to get an agenda that rolls in at least a thematically pro-liberty direction given this environment, we need an occupant of the White House who has a super ego. So we should be very happy about having such a super alpha as President, and hope his strength and will power can hang on through the election in his defiance of the swamp. Considering we are just a few days past when we were wondering if Trump would have the heart and soul to commute Stone’s sentence, I suggest we should heed the counsel of several pastors that Trump is the real deal, as far as being one of God’s tools for saving this nation is concerned. Let’s pray for him daily until Election day, and God will take care of the rest—as will I for now, until part 2.

Democrats, Doomsday, Deflation, and Deep State Deception

Posted on Updated on

As the country drifts towards the start of spring, “March Madness” in 2020 has taken on a distinctly different meaning than an annual hoops tournament. A cascade of “doom” events, or portents of same, are roaming the landscape simultaneously, like the slouching “what rough beast” Dylan Thomas talked about a century ago. The beast moved so slow, it seems, it has only gotten to us now. Hopefully you have all the time in the world to read through this, given the recent shutdown woes imposed upon our entire society by our benevolent masters. But anyway:

Democratic Doomsday

Of course, the big political story of the primaries has been how Creepy, head sniffing, early stage Dementia Joe Biden was somehow revived, just in time, to regain the aura of ‘inevitability’ he had totally lost by the time the actual primary contests started. Biden’s fall was perfectly natural, given his age, his inability to excite the crowds at campaign stops, his failing to even place well in key early states like Iowa and New Hampshire, and his torrent of strange gaffes and very odd actions. Yet, like a miracle, a Weekend at Biden’s moment happened, and with the Creepster firmly held up on each side by the national media and the Democratic Central Command, they dragged his carcass across the finish line, or across the Jordan of Super Tuesday, back to the blessed land of frontrunner milk and honey.

So what happened? In two words: Bernie Sanders. The radical Senator from Vermont, despite not being a registered Democrat, or having national level endorsements, or much of anything else except a loyal following by progressives within the Democratic grassroots, managed to keep that faction unified enough to lead in the initial states, giving him strong momentum to win most of the Super Tuesday states. This poised Bernie to be the party’s nominee for President in 2020, which would put all candidates downstream of that ticket (especially those running in Trump-friendly districts) in the position of having to defend 1) the party voting to impeach Trump, 2) the party not having an answer as to why the economy soared under Trump, and 3) the socialist policies offered by Sanders, that he freely admitted were socialist. Those factors were an automatic recipe for a massive wipeout of the party nationwide on Election day, otherwise known as, Democratic Doomsday.

How the Empire Struck Back

The party leadership decreed, this will not stand, and went to work to artificially reverse the naturally occurring ascendancy of the progressive wing of the party. First, the establishment fanned the sailboat called Senator Elizabeth Warren for as long as possible, as a means of splitting the progressive vote to prevent Sanders from ever winning, to clear the way for Biden. Second, a strange new app was devised to sort out the results of the Iowa Caucases (ahem, who needed an app to run election results in a small state, that had already managed to do so successfully for generations?). Sooo…the top DNC honchos put together a “defective” app that would produce confusing results, designed to blunt or muddy the momentum of Bernie right out of the box. Then the mess would be blamed on the Iowa officials, who after all are just a minute fraction of the Dem party. Only the mess was much more messy and extended than they planned, drawing prolonged attention to the whole corrupt re-cheating of Sanders, as some of the sharper pro-Bernie bloggers duly noted. Accordingly, when the app failed to function reliably, it caused the results to be trickled in for days, depriving Sanders of the crucial same night announcement that he was a winner—instead, the ambiguous results and victory had to be essentially ‘shared’ with Mayor Pete (Booty) Buttigieg, a gay former (?) CIA operative/asset turned small town executive

We know Pete was/is Deep State intelligence connected, because he got the massive coverage (unlike other minor city Mayors who ran for President, but were totally blacked out by the media). These tactics remind me of the all-nighter in the GOP Nevada contest in 2012, where it seems the vote counters were desperate to delay announcing final results until they found a way to depress Ron Paul’s vote totals. It’s SO blatantly obvious that the original Iowa results were (in order) most likely Sanders, Buttigieg, Warren, Klobuchar, and Biden. That’s why “the app failed” ahem, as they had to suppress the Sanders victory, and throw a lifeline to Biden to keep him from finishing lower than Amy. Despite this causing Sanders’ momentum to be blunted, and Buttigieg’s standing to be inflated, he still won New Hampshire narrowly but solidly anyway, and Nevada by even more.

Finally, though, the Dr. Frankenstein operatives trying to jolt Biden’s electrodes caught a break. The candidacy of billionaire Michael Bloomberg crumbled after his appearance in the debates—notably, due to establishment shill Sen. Warren leading the hostile savaging of him (hmmm, didn’t Princess Tiger Liar say she would keep things positive and not attack her fellow candidates?). This created a doorway for Joe to be reconsidered as the leading “centrist” in the race. Then they got (or demanded) South Carolina one man institution James Clyburn to endorse Biden just before the South Carolina “firewall” primary. Biden’s strong victory there (in the one state he was expected to win in the first place) created the cover the DNC needed to largely manufacture the Super Tuesday wins that followed.

As if on cue, all the ‘moderate” candidates dropped out of the race just before the big day, to instantly endorse Creepy Joe (all, of course, except for swamp stalking horse Sen. Warren, who doubtless had been told to stay in just long enough to divide progressives, frustrating Sanders by allowing Biden to win the close Super Tuesday races). The most critical victory of these machinations was that Biden had more total delegates coming out of it than Sanders had. Indeed, Joe won states he hadn’t even set foot in or spent advertising in, leading some to say, “it appears the votes for Biden were counted on Tuesday morning.” Thus at no point could Sanders ever get the “frontrunner” appellation handed to him, as that was being carefully reserved for the anointed Creepster. The usual media narrative could then proceed as originally designed—“Biden is the presumptive nominee, so everybody unify and get behind the frontrunner, the race is over.”

Biden’s “He’ll Do” Moment

Way back in 1992, commentator Michael Kinsley wrote a column to explain why the Democratic and liberal media establishment had embraced Bill Clinton, despite all his controversies, which were known even at that early point. His conclusion was that, in spite of Slick Willie’s glaring flaws and scandals (including that infamous ‘body count’ list), his political skills and other positives, and the overwhelming desire of Democrats to get the White House back after 12 years of Reagan and Bush, justified giving Bill a pass or a “he’ll do” seal of approval. Without question, given a choice between Sanders, who was felt to have zero chance of beating Trump, or Biden, who has next to no chance of winning, and doesn’t threaten to sink those down ticket, Biden would be far preferable. In other words, he’ll do.

But this means papering over, or bulldozing over, all his faults, failures, corrupt associations, and possible geriatric issues. His presumed “centrist” legislative record could be brought up, for example on guns, but not his promise to put rabid gun grabbers like Beto O’Rourke in charge of his gun policy if he got elected. The Biden machine also moved heaven and earth to cover up the assets of his son, Hunter Biden from being exposed, after a tryst with a stripper in Arkansas led to a pregnancy (his child, proven by DNA testing). The mother sued for child support, which of course meant that in discovery, Hunter would have to explain where all the over one million bucks he made from Burisma and other Ukrainian dealings came from, and went to. Instead, he claimed poverty and even tried to avoid a settlement—until the judge demanded he appear for a deposition, then lo and behold, he suddenly had the cash and the desire to quietly cut a deal with the mother. The money had to come from somewhere, since the greasy slimeball was claiming he was unemployed and cash poor. What is really obvious is that the judge rejected his attempt to blow off going under oath about his finances, leaving Team Biden (Hunter and Quid Pro Joe) no further option to avoid it but to settle with stripper mom.

Bernie’s “He Won’t” Moment

Just to be clear, as a libertarian, I am not a Sanders guy, but I do support populism, of whatever brand. Sanders comes off as a not corporate-owned, authentic person, while Warren is a elite controlled lying sham. What Sanders needed to do was fully embrace building a populist coalition, the way Trump did (only this time, on the left), but unfortunately too many of Bernie’s supporters are mired in an anti-liberty, pro-elitist mindset that would not relent from believing the Democratic leadership, or left end of the swamp, would be fine if they were running it. MoveOn and similar pro-Bernie outfits sniffed at the notion of needing non-left grassroots endorsements (like one given by Joe Rogan) to take power over everybody. They want the power, without any help from the ‘deplorables’ they would rather put under their heel. Only the elite may endorse the elite, as far as they are concerned.

They thought half the country was deplorable then, and they think the same now. This snooty contempt leads them to think the Trump era is simply a temporary aberration of the order of how things should really work, and their elite should be restored to power immediately to punish the peasants who put Trump in power. Like the leadership they decry, they remain clueless about the broader national and international trends leaning towards populist liberty, and about how complete their defeat was in the recent coup attempts. About the only thing going for the Dems now, from the Bernies to the Bidenistas, is that the fallout from the first caucus and primaries gave them leeway to change the subject away from their coup failure, or shampeachment disaster.

In the end, there was a double absence of will to face down the corporate left end of the establishment table, be it on the campaign trail or at the debates, and this has spelled doomsday for the attempt of progressives to ascend into controlling the party, for now. Basically, the Swamp Empire struck back and worked the defibrillator to zap Biden back to life at crunch time, while the Bernie forces didn’t return the volley—or else have resigned themselves to stay home again this November. Sanders won’t throw down or face down the swamp, and the so-called energized millenials won’t show up where that energy counts the most—the polls. It’s always the same with youth turn out. After all is said and done, only 12-15% of its demographic shows up at election time. Young adults are reliably good at three things—dating, partying (and now) swiping or tapping their smartphones. They haven’t felt beaten down enough by the government (whether they blame it on Dems or GOP) to get motivated enough to become active voters.

Whichever, absent younger voters showing up, a grassroots Democratic Presidential contender cannot succeed in winning the nomination without attracting a coalition of suburban women, urban blacks and southern voters—not to mention the will of its candidate to truly confront (and not capitulate to) the party and media establishment. The writing is on the wall for the progressives after the Bernie burnout, going into 2024 and beyond. In blunt terms, being openly socialist is out, and they need to find a black progressive candidate who can engage the Midwest to head their movement. Ohio’s Nina Turner is one example of what they need. Bingo—then they can appeal to blacks and southern states, and reach mid-western and working class voters. Short of that, their insurgency has run its course under the Senator’s candidacy.

If any one questioned the commitment of Sanders to carrying through with his campaign, or lack of same, the one-on-one debate with Biden of March 15 with Biden certainly ended all doubts. The CNN no-audience echo chamber (how ironic) was a one way spectacle, where the moderator pounced on Bernie (such as asking about his heart attack, of months ago), while omitting any mention of Biden’s recent torrent of gaffes that have many wondering not merely whether he is succumbing to dementia, but how fast his dementia is advancing. If Trump, by contrast, had doddered away in only ONE verbal incident that caused concerns over his mental acuity, CNN would be peppering him with questions on it at every presser or debate. What a farce. The only news here is that Bernie was in on the rigging. The fact that Bernie wouldn’t break with establishment dogma and say Russian intervention in the 2016 election was a fraud was already known, but he wouldn’t even go for the low hanging fruit to hang Joe on. He wouldn’t go after Joe over getting a mental cognitive test, he wouldn’t go after Biden for his long list of numerous lies, and he wouldn’t go after him over Ukrainian corruption. 1, 2, 3, strikeout. So of course, the Democratic primaries are over.

Still, the fact that Bernie, depending on his selecting the location, could get Monday Night RAW sized crowds, should settle the Dem argument over who their candidate should be. Sanders is the ONLY one who could prove he had an energized base—not Creepy Joe, not Money Mike, not Booty. Bernie is the one they should have gone with, if they wanted to have any chance in 2020. So be it the Creepy one, or Hillary rising from the grave to take the nomination from him, the party appears poised to experience a wipeout come November. It’s Democratic Doomsday, come the 2020 election.

Pandemic Doomsday

“It is ironic to see the same Democrats who tried to impeach President Trump last month for abuse of power demanding that the Administration grab more power and authority in the name of fighting a virus that thus far has killed less than 100 Americans…We have seen this movie before. Government over-hypes a threat as an excuse to grab more of our freedoms. When the “threat” is over, however, they never give us our freedoms back.” This comment by Congressman and libertarian standard bearer Dr. Ron Paul, as usual, summarizes the absurd dimensions of the Coronavirus (or COVID-19) global tidal wave that has smitten the political, financial and social scene over the last months, from Wall Street to cruise ships, to the Vatican.

Certain opportunists have been able to use the situation as a convenient shield to push for all manner of tyrannies, and to even score propaganda points against China and Iran, or other parties that don’t play ball with the US global empire. Cui bono, or who benefits from all this crisis mongering, face mask sales, or China bashing? And why are the chief crisis-fanners like NIAID head Dr. Anthony Fauci (Mr. “its getting worse”) trumpeted around the media 24/7 as one of the only talking heads worthy of giving a microphone to? Why are there no alternative doctors or virus experts brought forth to offer a counter or second opinion as to the “shutdown everything” and “blame China” prescriptions the government has been freely handing out to deal with the spread? Why all this one-way hyperbole over a virus that is only half as deadly as the seasonal flu?

Academics are Stubborn Things

Some of us want more truth, less heat, and less put downs of those who question things—and many of those who want this are academic researchers, or observers of the science literature over the last few months. For one thing, professional or peer reviewed science journals such as Science and The Lancet have declined to accept the official story that Wuhan, China “must be” the ground zero for where the virus started. The key matter is that the origin point of a virus, and the location of an outbreak of the virus can be two different things. Both the timeline of clinical cases that were discovered there, and the molecular profile of the virus suggest a different point of origin. Some observers also question whether the initial tests conducted even rationally established that the new strand was more lethal than other CV strands, since the tests in Wuhan were conducted in hospitals with subjects who had pre-existing illnesses (which may have heavily skewed the results).

According to Virological (again, a peer reviewed publication, not “some propagandist on the internet”), the genetic evidence is that the virus was brought by someone to the seafood market, most likely from outside China. Yes, that country has produced an abundance of cases since late fall, but only from one strand or ‘branch’ of COVID-19, whereas the true source of the outbreak would show a presence of all the strands of the virus, or ‘the trunk of the tree.’ Academics and health authorities from several countries have thus pleaded for the governments to disclose all their data on the pandemic, after which a fair and full evaluation can be conducted as to the origin of the virus.

Prof Michel Chossudovsky notes that “on March 12, in a statement to the US Congress (House Oversight Committee), CDC Director Robert Redfield unwittingly “spilled the beans”. He candidly admitted, yes, some cases diagnosed as seasonal flu could have been coronavirus. When did this occur? In October, November? What is the chronology.  It is worth noting that Redfield’s statement is corroborated by both Japanese and Taiwanese virologists. Two countries which are staunch allies of the USA.”

This kind of real science and critical scrutiny is what has been posted on the remaining free speech portals online, and hardly amounts to “conspiracy theories” floating around on the web. Larry Romanoff, author of several Global Research reports on the subject, says these considerations justify an “impetus for caution among the public in accepting the “official standard narrative” that the Western media are always so eager to provide – as they did with SARS, MERS, and ZIKA, all of which ‘official narratives’ were later proven to have been entirely wrong. In this case, the Western media flooded their pages for months about the COVID-19 virus originating in the Wuhan seafood market, caused by people eating bats and wild animals. All of this has been proven wrong.

“Not only did the virus not originate at the seafood market, it did not originate in Wuhan at all, and it has now been proven that it did not originate in China but was brought to China from another country. Part of the proof of this assertion is that the genome varieties of the virus in Iran and Italy have been sequenced and declared to have no part of the variety that infected China and must, by definition, have originated elsewhere. It would seem the only possibility for origination is the US because only that country has the “tree trunk” of all the varieties. And it may therefore be true that the original source of the COVID-19 virus was the US military bio-warfare lab at Fort Detrick.”

The Virus Profile Issue

There is also a question as to whether the virus strand was artificially generated. If it is naturally occurring, then it should die off in spring/summer. If not, well then, we have our answer. And then there’s the pesky matter that the pattern of cases that have emerged worldwide through mid-March, as pointed out by three different governments, show very unnatural concentrations of COVID-19 in specific countries—that all just so happen to have a political problem with Western nations at this time:

What is most distressing to a true libertarian is the “credit card” moment the declared epidemic has given the authoritarians in power, to run up their VISA card to ramrod wholesale restrictions on human movement, the right to assembly, and other expressions of voluntary choice. Gary Barnett notes on Lew Rockwell: “A so-called virus that has reportedly been responsible for a few thousand deaths, has allowed a small number of politicians to take over most of the globe. Entire countries are shutting down, and implementing different forms of martial law. Travel bans are now becoming universal, and the ruling class is demanding total isolation among entire populations. At the current time, this is called self-isolation, which would obviously be a voluntary behavior. The reality is that anyone that is told to self-isolate and does not do so, is forced at gunpoint to comply. This has nothing to do with self or voluntary action, but is the result of total despotic rule.”

Who Benefits from the Selective Spread

In short, we appear to be getting rolled on this subject. The cult of the omnipotent state is grooving off of the power it’s receiving through the pandemic, and you can see it or feel it with every new press conference they hold, or every new edict they pronounce. You can safely surmise you are being subjected to a propaganda campaign when you hear from only one side, with the other side getting mercilessly demonized, if mentioned at all. Black libertarian soulmate YoungRippa59 lays out the meaning behind this agenda-driven madness:

Deflationary Doomsday

On top of the political and pathogen doomsdays, it seems there were other factors impacting the severe correction seen in the capital markets. Namely, a steep drop in oil prices (down to $45 a gallon internationally) and the refusal of Russia to help OPEC prop up oil price rates. This played a huge role in creating the kind of uncertainty that causes investors to sell off, or park their money in Treasuries and precious metals. The details of the economics get kind of complex (as usual) but boiled down, the price of oil has been artificially held up too high by the cartels and by central banks, as the well has run dry for those manuevers being able to keep that commodity overpriced. That means (when major commodity prices go down), that we are entering a deflationary period, as opposed to periods of inflation, when prices are going up.

Writers like Thomas Luongo have stepped out the implications of deflation, the most relevant for us being that countries that have relied on debt (borrowing and deficit spending) based on the defacto backing of commodities like oil are in big trouble, as opposed to nations that are asset rich (like Russia) who rely on equity or savings. A loss in oil value means a loss in borrowing power, while those less dependent on borrowing are given more power in market. So of course Russia didn’t have to help the cartels, as it has no stake in their loss of borrowing power. Western countries are deeply affected, however because they seem to do nothing financially but dream up new ways to get in more debt.

One ally the debtor nations have had in staying on top are the central banks, but their bag of tricks mainly apply to manipulating inflationary markets, through controlling debt being issued, printing more money, and shifting interest rates. But those tricks don’t apply to deflation, leading to the banks being fairly useless in handling the current situation. Worse, by responding to the recent stock crash by lowering interest rates to near about zero, all they did was encourage the recent spate of unlimited short selling (those who bet stocks will go down) even more, thus encouraging even more stock sell offs. The banks have made it even cheaper for people to borrow in order to short sell, and they wonder why more short selling is going on? Doh! Fed chairman Powell should be ousted for incompetence, or prosecuted if he is doing this deliberately to hurt the President, as Trump has suggested. Perhaps if we cannot get the Fed done away with, we can at least audit the thing to find out if the Fed board have ulterior motives behind its decisions. As of now, the bank is supposedly ‘independent,’ yet if we turn over a few rocks, we might find too many on the board are in truth flunkies for the Deep State, and/or for a certain Hungarian or other euro billionaire.

But the Fed is a creature of the Federal Reserve Act, as enacted by Congress, which does require the Chairman to be appointed. Perhaps a bold President will someday assert that he will not be appointing any new Chairman other than the current Treasury Secretary, who DOES answer to the President. Or better, launch a suit challenging the constitutionality of the Federal Reserve Act, by asserting the document only authorizes the Treasury to be issuing or controlling the currency. Until that happens, expect Americans to remain under the continued yoke of debt, monetary-driven distorted markets, and an economy subject ongoing threat of collapse during a deflationary doomsday pressure cooker period, like the one we appear to be going into.

One bright side to think about, if you are generally bullish about the stock market, is this: Given that we all know the Dow was over 29,000 this winter, if you had then known a global emergency would drop the markets by 30%, wouldn’t you think it would be a tremendous one-time opportuniy to buy on a super low? This may be the very last chance investors will get, ever again, to buy while Dow is in the 20,000s. Do it while you can.

Deep State Shutdown Doomsday

Meanwhile, this past winter has been a prolonged Revenge Month by the Deep State, for the wins Trump achieved in January. In that month Trump was acquitted in the shampeachment, started kicking out NSC leakers, and the Dems humiliated themselves with the Iowa app mess. So naturally, the swamp has responded by setting up Attorney General Barr for criticism over reconsidering the Roger Stone sentencing, then dropping the case against McCabe. This does not show a swamp in control, it shows it throwing desperation punches, after it has been sent reeling by blows it has received from team Trump.

Donald Trump doesn’t work for the Deep State, and because he is an independent, post-CIA controlled President, the Deep State has worked on destroying him for four years. They’ve tried to topple him with multiple phony scandals, and with thousands of Obama or even Bush era holdovers in the State, Defense, DOJ and intel establishments ‘resisting’ him tooth and nail. He’s only just now digging himself out of the impeachment hole they dug for him, twice. To get to this point of being in the clear (relatively speaking), though, he has had to compromise—first in terms of holding off his intention to withdraw troops from the Mideast quagmires, and second in his choosing certain “double agents” of his own to negotiate with the swamp.

Attorney General William Barr, for example, is a compromise figure appointed after a deal was cut between Trump and the Bush gang, where the Bushes would retire from managing the right end of the swamp, in exchange for Barr sparing his old buddy Bob Mueller from the indictments of swamp people coming after the impeachment mania was over. Barr is there to enforce the truce, so he has to live up to that by eventually arresting swampers. But it’s pretty hard to clean up a rat cage, when you’re surrounded by swamp rats. It’s still the swamp’s DOJ, FBI, and MSM. Even a AG 10 times more aggressive than Barr would be a needle in a deep state haystack under the current state of these institutions. What so many of us want to see is SOMEBODY from the swamp elite getting indicted, arrested, a grand jury convened, or subpoenaed to testify under oath, or SWAT teamed before dawn, etc, to show justice is in progress regarding their activities.

Even so, when will it happen, cry those who want to see justice done on the coup plotters, both officially those out of power, and those more numerous holdovers still in the bureaucracies? The background issue remains, being able to convict these worms, who clearly know how to cover their tracks. The fact that the swamp creatures like Comey, McCabe, Brennan, Clapper et al warrant indictment does NOT establish that they can get convicted, given their ability to go group “radio silent” on their coup activity, by losing key evidence, stonewalling or slow walking the declassification of other documents, etc. Such tactics are designed to produce a black hole in the chain of evidence, from which sufficient smoking gun proof may never come out. How is Barr (or his lead prosecutor John Durham) going to PROVE, not just suspect, what they were up to during such periods? This is why the path to prosecution has been taking so long, and why Durham is now not expected to complete the investigation until summer. A couple of acquittals of these people will lead immediately to more swamp celebrations and santimonious rants about being “politically persecuted” like the ones we saw from McCabe last month. What good will premature arrests and indictments do, if it leads to them beating the rap?

What we are left with is a shutdown race, where Trump is now on track to shut down the Deep State swamp, while that swamp is out to shut him down first, this time by getting him defeated in November. To achieve that end, they are prepared to do just about anything—fraudulently revive Biden’s candidacy while it was full rigor mortis, shutdown the country and temporarily cancel its entire culture, foment a national medical crisis over a virus much less lethal than TB or swine flu, worsen a stock sell-off by engineering short selling, or make a deflationary economic event worse by getting its guys at the Fed to drop rates. All, all, all of this, to demoralize the public enough to blame Trump for it, and drive him out of office. Will the swamp succeed? Will they, or peace and freedom get to the finish line first? We’ll see what happens.

Swamp Wars: The Fall of Impeachment

Posted on Updated on

As the past year finally ends and rolls the ongoing saga into a new decade, one of the biggest changes to the American order has already happened—namely, the victory of populist-led liberty over the process-rigged machinations of ‘the swamp,’ or military/intelligence apparatus of the deep security state establishment. The latter complex is the heart of the enforcement infrastructure supporting the Empire’s cult of the omnipotent state, coupled with the corrupt politicans and kept media that protect it, and central banking systems that ultimately finance it. This structure is the backbone of the authoritarian regime libertarians oppose, but we get thrown off of focusing on it, due to the bad habit of dwelling too much on lifestyle issues on the edges of society, instead of striking at the root of tyranny brought to us by elite-run mass government.

Signs of the break-up of the racket have been building since as early as the Ron Paul and Tea Party grassroots movements in the past decade, but has accelerated in the last five years following the Brexit efforts in the UK, and the dawn of the “the people’s God” Trump era circa 2016. The Orange one’s reign has been a mishmash of incoherent policy from a strict ideological stand point, but has been thematically pro-liberty in opposing globalism, blunting expansion of military intervention abroad, appointing true constitution-minded Judges to the courts, defending (while not adding to) existing laws on immigration, and in relaxing taxation or centralized regulations that hindered free markets, employment and wealth creation in the US. The Brexiteers have likewise finally won the battle to peel the EU micro-managers off of their country in the December 2019 elections, and given PM Johnson a green light to proceed with the populist/nationalist agenda. Other countries in Europe may soon follow.

Pushback from the First Order, as the Empire Strikes back at the Rise of the Populists, has been swift and vicious, as the Sith Lord elites do not take kindly to losing their power to manipulate the system, and seeks to maintain every bit of the utter contempt for the “deplorable” grassroots population that they expressed in 2016. In America, their favorite practice has been to characterize the Trump campaign and administration’s actions as illegal or criminal, as a means of construing the President is guilty of “impeachable offenses.” The subsequent gaming of impeachment procedures that has resulted represents throwing the integrity out of what was supposed to a bi-partisan check and balance on abuse of power, and converting it into a partisan arm of the abusive accusers, as the swamp fights for its very survival. Several background battles have been at work during this past autumn or “fall of impeachment,” including:

Swamp War 1–Revenge of the Security State

More than anything else, the impeachment saga is about the swamp trying to undo the upending of their control over the actual government or permanent policy of the US. They also hunger to restore their control over the prevailing narrative about policy matters in the wake of Trump, and to re-marginalize the alternative media, thereby attaining a measure of power over both, following 2016. Only the intelligence community (IC) could be competent enough to cook up an entire new scam (following the collapse of Russiagate, and its weaponization of the independent counsel) to impeach Trump over in so short a time. The new scam came complete with a way to politically weaponize yet another bureaucratic process (this time, the whistleblower procedure), and to funnel the hearing process along star chamber lines.

Who else can invent such a dynamic, and execute it so seamlessly, with media consent? The only flaw in the design are the bumbling hack Democrats, led by such scoundrels as the lie-prone Rep. Adam Schiff. They messed up with the Mueller witchhunt, and blundered again this time, when it was found the Schiff team was contacted by the “whistleblower” before he even composed the report. The Dems = the Coyote, and CIA = Acme Corp, supplying them with anti-Trump devices. The press and the DNC are the arms of the Deep State. They’re the ones giving the dumb Dems most of their bad ideas, since the Dems aren’t smart enough to come up with them themselves. It is the CIA party that wants to keep running the country.

The Moon of Alabama blog has given the definitive summary of what happened: “In 2018 eleven former intelligence and military operatives joined the House as representatives for the Democrats. This was presumably a planned invasion by the security state…

A lunatic Lieutenant-colonel Vintman in the National Security Administration found that during the phone call Trump was not following the Colonel’s preferred foreign policy. He informed a former colleague, the CIA analyst Eric Ciaramella, who then contacted two former colleagues who worked for the Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee Adam Schiff. They cooked up a scheme in which the CIA analyst would play a ‘whistleblower’ and accuse Trump of wrongdoing. When the legal review of the complaint within the CIA found that the ‘whistleblower’ had no case, the Schiff folks leaked the issue to the press to put pressure on the Trump administration to publish the complaint.

…Russiagate, Ukrainegate and the impeachment nonsense were all driven by members of the deep or security state. The Democrats have been riding on these issues while neglecting the real life-and-death issue of their voters – health care, guns or climate change. They will be punished for it.”

The CIA, the enforcer for the deep state, also fears the independent spread of the truth. E.g., alternative media (online or offline) is apparently not under the swamp’s control, so media intelligence assets like Facebook have increasingly excommunicated it. The elite’s control of the political narrative must be complete, or else the ‘odd’ outlet will be excluded, or banished with the IC invented shutdown-debate term, “conspiracy theory,” so as not to interfere with the real IC covert ops going on. In truth, noticing major events are often orchestrated is not paranoid, it’s just accurate analysis. ‘Conspiracy theory,’ AKA awareness of establishment manipulation of news coverage and political perception, has always been mainstream i.e., supported by most of the public. It has taken a decades long government intelligence op to keep it all marginalized.

This is to ensure, in this case, that the IC method of framing Trump succeeds. The CIA strategem this past summer was to have several so-called whistleblowers emerge to imply sinister motives behind Trump’s communications with the incoming government of Ukraine, then use them to mount a drumbeat leading to impeachment. The head WB has since been (see above) deduced to be one Eric Ciaremella, a CIA operative and Joe Biden flunky who had already been removed from White House duty because of leaking, among a few others. His caper is a rerun of the “Kavanaugh fusillage.” This time last year, we were asked to believe that not one, not two, but three different women had suddenly “just remembered” (or finally decided) to come forward with ’80’s era sex charges related to the judge. Now, we are asked to believe that not one, but multiple parties from different agencies have decided to whistleblow against the President, also at the same moment.

And in each case, we can’t know who they are, but we find out they communicated with Dem committee chairs weeks or months beforehand, and that their accusations can be easily converted into articles of impeachment those same Dems “just happen” to have rapidly prepared. Cynically ingenious, but obvious as all get out. The whole point behind the swamp using the whistleblower procedure was to frame Trump while shielding the accuser from accountability or liability for making their charges. They’ve simply tried to redo the Kavanaugh smear process, this time without the nasty flaw of the accuser who launched the probe having to face cross examination under oath. They’ve also wanted to control the messaging from start to finish this time, given their attempt to have Mueller provide cover for them failed miserably during round one.

Consider, as one YouTuber has observed, “while TV was non-stop talking about impeachment, real news sources revealed all kinds of massive government corruption. Namely, that our government has been lying to us about the war in Afghanistan since its inception, or all of the chemical leaks in Syria were false flags planted by our government to get us into war with Syria. Nancy Pelosi refused to impeach Bush because it would have revealed her own complicitness in war crimes, including knowledge that Iraq did not have WMDs, and that she signed off on torture program. Also, Congress just re-upped the Patriot Act so that they can spy on us without a warrant.”

The shocker is not only that the soft coup against Trump happened, but that the coup is still in progress. However incompetent the Democrats have been in trying to oust a duly elected President, the Deep State has been painfully efficient in repeatedly trying to set up Trump staff, weaponizing government procedures, and covering their tracks afterwards. The motor of tyranny is clearly running. The coup must not only be stopped, and the persons performing it prosecuted, but the statutes (perhaps even the Constitution) must be amended to head off the runaround of the impeachment process that the swamp has tried to execute. Otherwise the second they get back power or get more power, we must expect they will resume, continue, or escalate the gaming of procedures and weaponization of government to serve their partisan interests.

Ciaramella himself needs to be indicted immediately, for a number of crimes, among them—
– illegal leaks, in violation of the Espionage Act
– sedition, by participating in a coup
– perjury, from untruths stated in the WB complaint
– accessory to bribery, in colluding with Obama and Biden in Ukrainian kickback schemes
– illegal solicitation of donations via GoFundme
And that’s just off the top of my head.

Swamp War 2–The Not-So Phantom Vengeance

Adding to the Deep State’s direct attempts, and serving as its faithful Wile Coyote functionaries, are hack Democrats and Never Trumper Republicans in political office (including some in the early Trump administration) or in the legacy media, who have gleefully taken every ‘Acme’ device the intel community supplies them, to try to blow up Road Runner Donald. Think about what we have experienced just in the past few months: Whistleblowers who aren’t whistleblowers. Witnesses who aren’t witnesses, but purveyors of secondhand hearsay. Impeachment inquiries that aren’t inquiries, but fishing expeditions. Complaint forms that aren’t the actual complaint, but just Lawfare letters. Subpoenas that aren’t subpoenas, but just demand letters. Second whistleblowers who aren’t second whistleblowers, but simply second leakers. And the hits keep on coming…

It’s the same MO as with Kavanaugh last year. Cynically timed charges, of an indirect nature, by a hidden claimant, who avoids being put under oath, and whose testimony only Democrats are first given access to, yet we are instructed must not be criticized. The faux whistleblower has indeed served the purpose intended, which was to provide a pretext for starting this one-sided inquiry, for which the conclusion (creatiing articles of impeachment) had already been decided upon in advance. This is a coup d’etat using admin trickery.

The Dems are taking up their administrative process tricks and scare letter tactics from the IRS. You know, the folks who send county clerks “notice of lien” documents that were never signed off by an actual judge, but once recorded by the clerk get treated as real liens anyway? Or who send people ‘certified’ letters no agent actually signed, but get treated as certified correspondance anyway? Etc, etc. Tyrants prefer to create equitable guilt or liability out of nowhere, then enforce it ruthlessly. So it also goes with the coup cabal, in their current bloodless bid to bring down Trump.

There have been at least 3 coups performed to destroy what was the free republic. The coups happened in 1913 (the creation of the current central bank and income tax, enforced to make us financially enslaved), in 1963 (the killing of JFK, to head off his reining in the developing deep state, aka the Rise of the Machine), and now (to stop Trump, the first President to full on fight it since JFK). The real reason Pelosi announced a “formal impeachment inquiry” was to set up getting the legal authority to subpoena the grand jury records containing testimony from the Mueller investigation. Dems feel there is enough innuendo about obstruction in the testimony to conjure up at least an additional article against Trump. Rep. Nadler has been trying to get those docs and data for months, but a judge ruled against him in mid-August, saying he had to have a formal impeachment proceeding in place to petition to access them.

In the interim, the swamp cooked up a whole new faux Ukrainian collusion scandal, to generate the momentum to get the support needed to conjure up the “formal inquiry.” Once they get access to the grand jury info and witnesses, they will claim they have the direct evidence proving Trump obstruction, which is the pretext they needed all along to proceed to a vote on more articles of impeachment. What created the Ukraine call flap was its reference to re-examining Crowdstrike’s report on the DNC server. Crowdstrike is the third party auditing firm that claimed the server was hacked by Russia, a claim curiously never verified by the FBI directly checking it out themselves. For if there is no actual forensic evidence the server was hacked, that undermines the whole original basis for “Russiagate” in the first place. The protect-Clinton operatives of the deep state were rattled by that coming up, and so in response set up the “let’s game the whistleblower system” plan to impeach Trump.

Note the attempts by the media to not mention Crowdstrike at all, or even to delete the word from the transcript. Note that the first question Stephanopoulos recently asked Rudy Giuliani on This Week was not about knocking it off about accusing Biden, but to knock off arguing about “Ukraine hacking the server” (which Rudy wasn’t even alleging). Ukraine-gate is largely about deflecting away from a new inquiry into the DNC server, not just the corrupt Bidens. They needed a second person to come forward because the first one’s credibility is already shot to pieces, from the early interactions with Schiff’s staff alone. The fake media has been even using the same old tired “according to a new bombshell report” hype rhetoric, LOL.

But like the Kavanaugh episode last year, the believability declines as the accusers multiply–how many people are we supposed to think are acting without an agenda, when they present their charges in the same exact oblique, secretive and accountability-avoiding fashion? It’s looking more like once the Deep State leakers alerted the swamp that Trump was going to work with Zelensky to expose the corrupt dealings between Ukraine and US officials, they went wild with panic and cooked up the entire whistleblower charade.

As one commenter put it, “It’s becoming clearer that many high-level Democrats were involved in a major kick-back scheme in regard to foreign aid given to various countries. Whatever foreign aid was handed out, a certain percentage would travel back to the Democrats’ coffers or to places like the Clinton Foundation slush fund. It was corruption on an industrial scale, and may be the real reason why the Democrats went out of the minds when Trump managed to get elected, and have been acting crazy ever since. When the true extent of the money-laundering corruption is revealed, the Democratic party may cease to exist as a viable political party.”

Swamp War 3–A Weakness Has Been Found

Two weaknesses, actually, One is the Crowdstrike factor, the other is the FOIA system which fraudulently launched the first Trump probe. As reported by attorney Joe DiGenova,

“On April 26, 2017, an unsealed FISA Court Ruling unveiled a number of criminal activities that Barack Obama’s FBI and DOJ participated in during his time in office. The report to date received little attention. Now interest is brewing due to the recent actions of Congress and the report that is expected to be released in the upcoming weeks.

The FISA Court Ruling shows widespread abuse of the FISA mandate. According to the report, Obama’s FBI and DOJ performed searches on Americans that were against their 4th Amendment rights. This went on for years. One paragraph in the report states that 85% of the Section 704 and 705(b) FISA searches made during this time were non-compliant with applicable laws and therefore criminal.”

In fact this was largely about protecting Obama, who approved of this non-compliance, and who in turn used the entire appartus of the government to protect Hillary. The POTUS is, day to day and week to week, the most politically informed person in the country, who receives briefings constantly about what is going on in the world and within the administration. There is no way he could not have known about the FOIA abused operation to surveil Trump, or frame him with collusion, or gross interludes with hookers, and finally to overturn his election via the “insurance policy” soft coup.

All of this shows how desperately Democrats wanted to control first impressions in the spring, when the Mueller report was completed. They wanted to get the document first unredacted, then leak out only the negative sounding statements immediately, to put the public in support of impeachment hearings in the House. Because Attorney General Barr put out a more accurate summary of the report first, noting the lack of evidence found for collusion and obstruction, it killed off any false momentum for impeachment. So this time the Ukraine-gate coup plotters think they have gotten back control over the first impressions and momentum, by controlling access to the faux whistleblower, the testimony, and the rollout of the testimony transcripts. Alex Jones has reported the planned end game is for the Dems to share the biased info they collected with anti-Trump state prosecutors, to in turn get a massive amount of indictments against him created at the state and local levels during 2020.

Indeed, Laura Ingraham said recently on her FOX show, if Dems (or really, the swamp) gets the White House back, they will be going on a full “revenge tour” on the deplorable half of the country. They will tax their socks off, criminalize (not just censor) alternative voices on social media, go for Beto style gun grabbing, pack the courts with more Amy Bermans, etc. And we may not get to actually vote under an honest election process, ever again.

Swamp War 4–Attack of the Corruption

The other heart of the matter is that a bunch of swamp politicians, bureaucrats and CIA operatives are scrambling to avoid jail time. There is a cornocopia of swamp scandal related to everything about how the Ukraine government was color revolution flipped from Russian friendly, to US Empire/Deep State compliant during the Obama regime. Some patriots are still there who know how much they were manipulated and cowed.

It appears a swamp/deep state spy (again, Eric Ciaramella) discovered Ukraine might actually follow-up on Trump adminstration suggestions that the new government resume its investigation of extortion committed by the Bidens. The same swamp accusing Trump of threatening to withhold aid unless Ukraine complied with his wishes, is not at all concerned that Biden ACTUALLY threatened to withhold aid unless the country complied with HIS wishes. The whole purpose of this flap is now to retroactively taint any follow-up by Ukraine on the Bidens as corrupt influence on the next US election, on behalf of Trump.

The whistleblower and Schiff will not testify because of the kangaroo structure of the inquiry, and because of the schedule, which is all the Dems care about. The swamp’s plan was to impeach Trump by fall 2019, period. PERIOD. The only reason Ukrainegate exists is because their number one ticket to impeaching him, Russiagate, collapsed in the first half of 2019. They needed something to replace it ASAP, in time to get the inquiry going, whcih was always planned for later in the year. The only thing that was established at the sham public inquiry was how obvious it was the Dems couldn’t handle even the first day of a hearing where their witnesses faced real (but limited) cross examination. Their two prize first witnesses even admitted (by silence when asked) that Trump had not committed impeachable offenses!

Keep in mind Ukraine is a far smaller country, so its swamp is far less deep. The US Deep State is canyon deep, and fiercely combats being uprooted to a much greater extent than the oligarchs could manage. So that’s why Ukraine has been able to get results from its own investigations much faster. As one internet commenter summarized things, “The blackmail bank of the Democrat criminal cabal is well stocked, locked and loaded. They employed Jeffrey Epstein and many others to compromise everyone in Washington they would ever need to “handle.” They never saw Trump coming so they never bothered to record something compromising (sexual, financial or other). They had Sessions and used him well.  The Clintons and Obamas were so smug that they had every base covered, and then came Trump.”

Historian Doug Wead has also pointed out how the swampers “didn’t even take a breath” to apologize for spreading the Russian collusion story after the Mueller report refuted it, before rolling right over to the Ukrainian bribery accusations.Then they didn’t even take a breath from dropping that narrative, to voting to impeach Trump. The plan and schedule all along was to have an impreachment vote by the fall, and have it hanging over Trump during Christmas. These folks are mean, petty and spiteful people.

Swamp War 5–A New Hope-less Democratic Civil War

One side issue in the background is the swamp war going on inside the Democratic party over its current and future leadership. Since at least 2008, there has been a battle going down between the centrist or corporate-liberal oriented “Team Clinton” (who have controlled the national party through proxy since the ’90’s) and the decidedly more progressive “Team Obama” and his circle, following his election as President. Obama is said to be resentful he had to accomodate the Clintons throughout his two terms, and cover for Hillary’s corrupt hide going into the last election. The stiffing of Sen. Bernie Sanders’ ability to win by the DNC was controlled by team Clinton during the 2016 primaries, which in turn ticked off his millenial supporters. This war extended through after Hillary’s defeat in 2016, which many Democrats reasonably blamed on Clinton (“hey, if we had ony nominated the likeable progressive with no baggage, we could have won the thing!”). That sentiment has contributed to the election of more radical figures such as AOC and Omar, et al in the 2018 midterms. These newer faces largely blame the very existence of a President Trump on the corporate types at the top of the party.

The tie-in of this struggle to the impeachment battle seems to be:

1) Obama wanted to be the head of the Democratic party during his Presidency, but the Clintons wouldn’t relinquish their dominant background influence. But team Obama wanted a legacy of attaining control regardless. So they opted to take advantage of the next President’s naivete. Upon taking office, Trump failed to fire all political appointees of Obama. Trump then failed to review and fire all Obama political appointees who transitioned to career government employees before Obama left office. Hundreds of Obama political appointees applied for career positions just before Obama left office in order to burrow into the incoming Trump administration. Trump had one year to identify and terminate employment of anyone who transitioned from political appointee to career appointee before the one year career probationary year was completed. During the probationary year career conditional employees can be fired with little to no protections. But that mostly didn’t happen. This group comprises the bulk of “the Resistance” within the government swamp who have be fighting Trump’s every move ever since. The reason it is called the Deep State, is that it has a very deep roster.

2) Hillary had two temper tantrums that created the impeachment sham. Many of the millions from the Clinton Foundation went to the DNC, to help the Clintons buy control of the national party. This influence was used to get the DNC to put their thumb on the scale to sabotage the Sanders 2016 campaign, even though he was more popular than Hill-beast in the primaries. Wikileaks exposed this chicanery by mid-2016, and in reaction (that is, after Hillary blew her top), team Clinton decided to invent the “Russia hacked the DNC” meme to demonize Wikileaks and Trump. This is what got expanded into the “Trump colluded with Russia” smear and investigation, especially after she lost the election, causing Hillary temper tantrum number 2.

3) Is Biden in the race mainly to protect him from being investigated for corruption? Could that explain his lackluster, gaffe-prone campaigning? It feels more and more like Biden (a team Clinton rep) will be beaten by Buttgieg or Sanders in Iowa. Either Sanders or Warren (another team Clinton rep, in the race to ensure Bernie’s progressive vote gets split) win New Hampshire, and Biden might only squeak out a win in SC. The Super Tuesday primaries will then not determine a break away frontrunner, as the deep money bags factor—namely the billionaire Steyer and Bloomberg ads explosion—will suppress or compete with Biden’s numbers. So the Dem primaries may drag on without establishing a leader who gets close to the delegate totals need to win the nomination on the first ballot. Enter a Dem “savior” to walk in, to win a contested convention, which could go to team Obama (if Michelle O walks in), or if Hillary does so, to achieve one last hurrah for the Clinton era.

Swamp War 6–The Last Neocon:  War Insurance

An additional contributing factor motivating the Empire to weaponize impeachment proceedings has been the foreign intervention factor. The great unspoken issue over the last three years is that the establishment has been using the faux impeachment scandals to pressure Trump away from drawing down troops in the Mideast. Every time he has talked openly about removing them, boom!, another ‘bombshell’ report would flare up on Russiagate (now Ukrainegate) as if on cue.

Or, another false flag incident would happen (either a ‘gas attack’ blamed on Assad, or a gun shooting at home) to keep Trump off-balance. Then Sen. Graham and other swamp GOP kept secretly warning the President they would provide no support for him unless he kept towing the line on endless intervention. Perhaps Trump is signaling enough is enough, he is at last pulling out of the no-win quagmires, regardless of ultimatums from Graham and the neocons. While the Dems have been weaponizing impeachment to ultimately regain power in Congress and the White House, the GOP hacks have been quietly using it a a kind of insurance, to keep the wars going.

Those who might doubt this should ask a simple question–how come Senate Republicans have not held one-sided Senate hearings (that they control) on these issues, in answer to the one-sided Democratic-run hearings in the House? By not holding hearings, the GOP has repeatedly left Trump out on a limb. For example, Trump’s exploration of Ukrainian corruption and the Bidens has been relentlessly cast as “interfering with the 2020 elections.” What if Graham had held hearings on the corrupt Bidens, to establish everything Giuliani uncovered? Then the Dems would have had no basis for attacking Trump for following up on what the hearings had found out. By the inaction of the RINOs in the Senate on Biden, they opened up Trump for being charged for exposing the corruption. And why? Because they are either anti-Trump as well, or they want to hold his feet to the fire on staying interventionist.

Rand Paul and Donald Trump were the only two candidates in 2016 who criticized the Iraq war, or called for a less interventionist foreign policy. And that is the reason why the Russiagate and now Ukrainegate scandals have been thrown in the President’s way ever since, to block or interfere with his rollout of any withdrawals from anywhere. Notice Paul is still the only consistent GOP supporter of Trump’s pullout plans in the Senate. In parallel, he alone has called out Graham and other Senate Republicans for not more rigorously defending Trump by holding hearings. Again, this is because those RINOs actually like the scandals as they keep Trump distracted and in delay mode when it comes to ending the forever wars. The two issues are linked. Update: this theory has been further confirmed by recent stories in Salon and the NY Times.

So naturally, each time Trump has made noises about troop withdrawals or drawdowns, or making any effort to negotiate with Russia, he’s been savaged by drummed up scandals designed to get him impeached. Could it be Ukrainegate was cooked up to again keep him from going through with withdrawals from Afghanistan and Syria? And why is it, for the 1999th time, there is an ever so convenient NEW domestic shooting incident, to revv up momentum for pushing gun control AGAIN, just before Congress returns? I put nothing past the criminal elements of the Deep State activating one after yet another sleeper crazy into going off on a killing spree. The cynical timing of each of these cases is too improbably helpful to one side of the gun debate, over and over, to be accidental.

Given the pro-AIPAC domination of Congress, who want endless belligerence and one sided deals exercised towards all of Israel’s neighbors in the Mideast, what is most needed now is a President who goes into (or back into) office making it clear, after quickly withdrawing from places like Syria, that he/she will not intervene in or invade countries without a declaration of war from Congress. Tulsi Gabbard could be that President, or the Secretary of State for such a President. The issue was always the US covert intervention, which trained, armed and supplied the Syrian fighters to the teeth, who mostly swiftly turned into ISIS fighters, forcing the US to in turn arm the Kurds to contain them. Now that Trump has undone the Obama era covert activity and brought down ISIS (with Syria, Russia and Iranian forces), the withdrawal has rapidly caused the Kurds to reconcile with Syria, and the Turks’ protection of the border area should keep things stable and immune from a re-emergence of ISIS.

On the GOP side, proported sex scandals have alternately been utilized either to keep Trump in pro-war line, or to ruin him outright. It’s now also well known that when the Billy Bush tape was released to the public former Speaker Paul Ryan and other Republican (swamp) leaders were pressuring VP candidate Pence to go along with replacing Trump as the Presidential candidate. They were plotting before the election, during the transition, and into the first year of Trump to destroy him. After leaving Congress, Ryan returned to Wisconsin because he “wanted to be with his family”—riiiiight. Now he’s come right back to DC be on the board on FOX Corp. (to steer the network in the establishment’s direction), and to be with his real family, the GOP end of the swamp. He’s getting in position (with Graham, Sen. Mitt Romney, financial guru Anthony Scaramucchi or ‘Mooch,’ et al) to take back control of the party and DC after the Trump era. They want everything Trump did expunged and populism reversed as soon as possible, so they have to start to get things set up.

That’s EXACTLY what Romney-Ryan-Graham-Mooch are working on, or at least considering. And notice that two of the four (Mitt and Mooch) have tens of millions available to self finance a third party run in 2020, to siphon off just enough GOP votes to cost Trump the election. This once again shows much GOP support for what the voters actually want is one heart beat deep—namely Trump’s heart beat. If he wasn’t there, their top functionaries would go right back to being losers for the establishment, only they would be more open about it.

Mitt’s probably been planning this since 2016, along with Ryan and Mooch. The only question is, will he also try to run an independent campaign in the fall election, or encourage one of the others to do so, to deprive Trump of enough electoral votes to get re-elected? Or, will the last Neocon hope turn out to be female, with Rey being played by Nikki Haley, the former UN ambassador? In her recent interviews, Haley goes out of her way to complain about former Chief of Staff General Kelly and former Secretary of State Tillerson, by bringing up cases where they openly opposed Trump, to make them look bad because they were not hawkish enough. She’s clearly setting herself up to be the hawkish restorer of a fully interventionist foreign policy in the post-Trump era.

The reality is, on every front, peaceful overtures and honoring our word would be the far wiser course. In fact, it was wrong for Trump to try to unilaterally scuttle the Iran agreement, a deal that country was complying with as per the inspections. Once Iran saw the US would escalate sanctions on them regardless of their compliance, with the other signers going along with it, good luck ever getting them back to the table to work out another deal. Ukraine was color revolutioned (by covert ops) into being a US client state, but Obama didn’t want to push the regime change further with military aid. Haley should have joined the others into persuading Trump out of escalating tensions in both areas, instead of merely positioning herself to bootstrap her full-on neocon run for the White House later on.

But the better answer is to continue the deescalation, and ignore the false flags that keep furthering the interventions. The withdrawal or drawdown in Syria, for example, has forced the Kurds to cut a deal with Syria for their own survival, while Turkey has agreed to back off them, while controlling the northern area for now to protect its resources from ISIS and Iran. This is all because of Trump’s pullout decision, not Graham’s war dog screaming. Kurdish fighters have slaughtered over 40,000 Turkish fighters and civilians, which is why Turkey has been so bitterly opposed to them. Having beaten ISIS, we should leave the Kurd issue to Syria and the border issues to Turkey and Syria, where it belongs. Time for us to come home.

Swamp War 7–The Fall of Impeachment, or Pelosi Bait

What this all adds up to is the obliteration of the option of impeaching a President as a credible means of checking the Executive, or otherwise “bringing balance” to the government force the elites crave so dearly. What has brought stability and growth, as well as overall net progress towards liberty has been the outsider movement led by the Orange one, all his flaws nonewithstanding. Trump’s grassroots popularity has totally exposed the phony, swamp-created dominant image of public opinion as ‘center-left’ on everything. His rallies show a natural and energetic mass support for his Presidency and policies, compared to the projection machine-devised or media-manipulated ‘popularity’ of establishment politics.

Perhaps Trump taunted Pelosi into impeaching him, using it as bait to utterly destroy the Democrats in the elections later, due to this popularity. By fighting his broad well of support with impeachment mania, the swamp Empire has irreparably damaged the integrity of the procedure for correcting anything, as it will from now on be associated with partisan crookery. Their trump card has thus been Trumped. The Swamp hotwired the investigation process with Mueller, to justify an impeachment inquiry. They hotwired the whistleblower procedure to trigger another investigation. Then they hotwired the sham basement ‘inquiry’ precisely so they could frame Trump while protecting the cooperating witnesses from being prosecuted for perjury or other fraud, and to control access to the evidence. It was NOT a slapdash operation, it was intentionally rigged.

Then they hotwired the House hearing process to continue to deny Trump due process, and to expedite an impeachment vote. And now they seek to hotwire the Senate side of the process by 1) demanding it run along the lines the Democrats want before they turn over the articles, and 2) trying to move 3-4 ‘moderate’ GOP Senators over to their side, to win the upcoming rules votes by 51-49. At this point Dems are weaponizing every part of the rules to get their way, and back into power. Because they broke the rules to get their ill-gotten articles, they broke impeachment itself, and henceforth the procedure will have no power to unseat or even ruin a President anymore, even if he had done something impeachable.

A new theory has been floated (based on the ‘new normal’ of freely bending the procedures we are now in) that contends not only will Democrats lose the majority in the House, but the new majority can then vote to revoke the biased articles and exonerate Trump once it convenes. In which case, Pelosi’s sole ‘achievement’ of this term would be completely repudiated. As one conservative Jedi has well put it, “Trump will be the first president in history to be impeached by the House. Acquitted by the Senate. And reelected to a second term. While regaining control of the House and Senate, his impeachment record will be expunged from history. We’ll continue with record setting economy, and prosecuting Obama officials. Appointing hundreds of conservative fed judges, and 2 more justices to the Supreme Court.”  Well, we’ll see what happens. Peace and Freedom in the 2020s!




Exits, Transitions, and Making NY Free Again

Posted on Updated on

So why the year and a half break in posting, as those who paid enough attention to my scribblings to care, might also care to ask? Well, as most non-bloggers know, life can be, or become too busy to keep up a journal or collect one’s thoughts (which is probably why they don’t run a blog). Suffice to say, there were a few other preoccupations that became more pressing, even, than politics for me, and a few political objectives that were deemed more pressing than, or warranting a break from this blog, to wit:

Plans and Projects

Among the politically-related activities happening in the interim was my further exploration of the concepts explained in last year’s “growth hacking liberty” article, to find or confirm opportunities existed that matched what was then described. There will be subsequent posts on certain upcoming real world ways to implement getting more Libertarians elected, or achieving victories for liberty. Those current examples involve 2020 to a great degree, and will be discussed in much greater detail presently on this blog. I have also been working on setting up a sister blog (devoted specifically to Christian libertarian, or other cultural and philosophical subjects), and plan to go active with it by the start of the new year. I have also become more fascinated by certain Presidential candidates coming up to represent the Libertarian or voluntaryist way in 2020, from Adam Kokesh to Nic Leobold. More on these campaigns are definitely coming up.

Circumstances have also changed in my own local group (discussed further down) that is moving me into taking a position leading the launch of a NYC-based Libertarian Political Action Committee in 2020 to assist liberty causes and candidates in the new decade. This project will encompass traditional as well as innovative fundraising efforts if successful, and in improving the organization of efforts to curb or reverse the trend towards ongoing gun control, eminent domain abuse, and producing more criminal justice reform or other libertarian goals in the city and state. More details on this project will be explored as the different components of this drive develop.

Many, Many Political Turns

There of course have been many, many crazy, or significant events (or both) dropping since summer 2018, representing a number of changes in the local, national and world landscape. In my neck of the woods, the biggest liberty event by far has been the ballot access victory of the Libertarian Party of New York (or LPNY, the state affilliate of the national LP) achieved by the performance of LP candidate Larry Sharpe in the 2018 race for Govenor. His 96,000 votes or roughly 2% showing in the race gained permanent ballot status for LPNY, allowing the LP to get an officially recognized line on the ballot for every election from 2020 going forward (so long as the party has a similar 1% plus vote total in future gubernatorial elections). This, in theory, should result in an explosion of new enrollments of registered Libertarians in the state, and more candidates (who can now be more easily fielded) to represent the party up and down the ballot.

Nationally, my prediction that the Democrats would face ‘doomsday’ in the midterm elections turned out to be premature, as they attained majority control of the U.S. House in Congress. The Dems’ deathknell was postponed largely due to the phenomenon of rampant election fraud and manipulation across the nation. This was especially true in California, where in every close race where the Democratic candidate lost as of election night, “vote harvested” absentee votes appeared to magically flip traditionally GOP seats Democrat after a few days (or weeks) of extra counting. In Florida the the rigging was so obvious that even mainstream pols like Senator Rubio and state Attorney General Bondi called it out as it was happening, thereby saving the elections of a new Republican Governor and Senator from being stolen.

Despite promising up and down that the Democratic take control of the House would not be used to clog up the legislative calendar with a non-stop “get Trump” impeachment campaign, the Pelosi-led forces (guided by the deep state-controlled intelligence community) has bombarded the schedule with such investigations, with the apparent intent of aggravating or harassing him out of office. The campaign has already crashed and burned with the Mueller Russia-gate investigation coming up snake eyes, and they are currently crashing and burning on Ukriane-gate, another CIA-fanned scandal based on a phantom “whistleblower” floating a phantom bribery/Quid Pro Quo charge against the President. My next post will be going into this craziness in detail. My updated pronouncement is Dem doomsday will result in November 2020, as a result of going down this insane path.

The broader populist revolt against swamp or deep state procedural tyranny has continued, but has in many places run into an “Empire Strikes Back” counterattack, be it the impeach-mania circus in the US, or the maniacal manueveuring going on in the UK and EU to block the implementation of Brexit. The swamp MPs have now played their true hand, and shown they just want more extensions so as to completely prevent ever leaving the EU. The new sort-of pro-Brexit Prime Minister Boris Johnson can use that to get a clean Brexit, or the watered down, rehashed May deal he offered to the EU in October. In the US as in UK, it still comes down to the bottom line of establishment resistance, over which the populist parallel is exact:

-US Democrats still do not respect the results of the 2016 election.
-Remainer MPs still do not respect the results of the 2016 election.

Until the immediate dynamic changes, there will be a problem in attaining a true exit from tyranny, the ongoing demeaning of “the deplorables,” relief from the censorhip of alternatives on social media, or true transition to something that better serves a free people. But the promise of those exits and transitions is now before us, more tangible than ever before, thus should give all of us hope.

The Passing of Stevens, and the Queens Libertarians

And locally, my situation and location (Queens, NY) has been affected by the recent loss of Dr. Robert Thomas Stevens, an attorney and leading figure in LP politics in the borough and region for over a decade. Dr. Stevens was truly the ‘Ironman’ of the “Queens Libertarians” (QL) organization (previously the LP of Queens County or LPQC, a chapter of LPNY). He served over the years in turns as its Chair, Membership Secretary, state rep, and main program scheduler, as part of the successful Libertarian education speaking program QL has run through its 25 year straight history of monthly meetings. Stevens also served as Chair of the Pennsylvania Libertarian Party, as a local GOP leader, and as a Presidential candidate of the Objectivist Party. According to his sister Joanne, My dear brother and I were together the night before in the hospital and he looked very well and was happy He was talkative and optimistic.

“I have a beautiful snapshot in my mind of his smile as I waved goodbye unbeknownst that this would be the last time we would say we love each other on this Earth. Tom loved life and people and knowledge. He was so smart. He lived a spirited and enthusiastic life and he truly cared about people. Tom had a great sense of humor and touched so very many lives in such a positive way.” 

As a result of his passing QL has decided to put me back in charge (as I was a past county chair, and Stevens previously announced he was retiring from activity at the end of the year, in part due to health issues). QL will seek to find out if we can re-orient the group into a fundraising organization or PAC, in addition to spearheading a number of area pro-liberty causes and alliances. We feel we have a role in acting as a hub of libertarian activism at this time, in light of the lack of such an emphasis among the chartered LP chapters in the metro area (who are involved in much administrative minutia transforming the LPNY into a permanent party structure as per the state election law). Given the enormous size of the metro area, where the Queens population alone (over 2 million-plus people) would make it a top 10 city in the US if counted as separate from NYC, there is clearly enough room for more than one active libertarian organization per county. To make New York free again, we need more decentralized activist groups, not less, to handle liberty outreach and projects for such an enormous region.

Well, at least Stevens understood that, as did I, and many long time members and friends of LPQC or the Queens Libertarians. But because this independent sensibility (and some local personalities) conflicted with other mentalities within the state LP, the reputation of the Queens group was savaged over the years. The party is a potato chip compared to other entities, but certain self-declared guardians thought it best to demean, isolate, and eventually de-charter this group, to maintain its absolute control over the potato chip. I have avoided going into this internal matter on my blog for years, but will review the history of the controversy on this one occasion, as itemized below:

The 90s-2006 Era

Many activists in the Libertarian Party of New York (LPNY) who extend back to the 1990s in their involvement with the party have been comfortable with the original ‘hub’ form of organizing. The party centered its activity around the meetings held in Manhattan (under a combined 5 borough NYC Libertarian chapter), Long island, and Capitol District regions, with limited stable party presence anywhere else. After the NYC Chapter disbanded over severe divisions about endorsing Howard Stern for Governor in 1994, individual boroughs in NYC were encouraged to organize as local LP chapters under LPNY. The LP of Queens County, founded by Queens real estate broker John Procida in late 1994, was the first county level chapter to do so in NYC, and was its most successful local chapter through the mid 2000s. Even after local affiliates were established for other boroughs, LPQC maintained parity status with Manhattan LP as the most active chapters in the city for the next ten years, at times having the most members, and running more candidates for office during this period than Brooklyn and Staten Island combined.

As the party considered different means of evolving to grow the Libertarian movement in NY during that time, vigorous debate emerged over scaling up the party’s operations and organizing practices. Among the most vocal about proceeding in that direction were LPQC members Dr. Tom Stevens, who suggested increased professionalism and more alliances with liberty-friendly persons in and out of the LP, and Sam Sloan, who preferred litigation as a means for addressing wrongs. It was suggested that the state party should expand its operations beyond organizing a convention and a petition drive each campaign year, and perhaps pursue forming more ‘hubs’ for activity than the Manhattan, LI and Albany centric approach, where the local population could support it.

LPQC was the primary group advocating for more expansion, and for supporting the autonomy of local chapters to develop or try out effective methods to achieve the same. Old line members (who wanted the more tightly controlled ‘hub’ layout to continue) were resistant to this, and to the approach or “look” of activists like Stevens or Sloan, who were seen at times as too combative. Following Stevens becoming a more dominant figure circa 2005, and with dissatisfaction with the early turnout for a LPQC convention in early 2006, certain state members led the creation of a block vote of the state committee to neutralize Queens and Stevens by de-chartering the chapter in November 2006.

Queens hotly objected to the action, quickly reorganized a new LPQC chapter as per the bylaws in January 2007, and brought their case (led by chapter founder Procida) to the 2007 state convention. The convention body present overwhelmingly voted to reinstate LPQC to resolve the issue, but “the faction” would go on to persist in bad mouthing or trying to isolate the Queens chapter for years, while continuing to plot to neutralize or remove Stevens and Sloan. Their most frequent routine was to 1) repeat fact-free accusations and past smears about Stevens (including one charge that went to trial, that he was acquitted of) issued by a previous organization that wanted to marginalize him, rather than expand or grow. 2) Then upon smearing without proving it, proceed immediately to a punitive action (suspension, de-chartering, etc). Sentence first, verdict afterwards, or never.

The 2010 Suspensions

Several persons running for the LP nomination for statewide positions in 2010 (Sam Sloan, Kristin Davis) and other observers of the 2010 state convention (Tom Stevens) expressed there was undue favoritism (among convention organizers) supporting one candidate for Governor, that came at the expense of other candidates. Stevens posted arguments about this on LPNY discussion boards and in his blog, while Sloan litigated about it as an injured party. LPQC supported Sloan’s right to attempt to get his day in court to seek remedy over the matter, but did not endorse his other actions (such as attempting to get the LPNY line via a separate independent petition process, or suing some specific committee members). Davis elected to run for Governor on another created Libertarian line, which she succeeded in petitioning for. It has been suggested that had Davis not perceived favoritism practiced against her at the 2010 convention, she would not have run on a separate libertarian line. Thus many of her 23,000 votes would have gone to the LPNY candidate, and LPNY would have gained permanent ballot status as of that year.

In response to Sloan’s suit, certain members of the state committee chose to assert that they were the victimized party, accused Sloan of practicing aggression, and cast both Sloan and Stevens as performing “disruption” against the state party. During the summer of 2010 in the middle of a LP campaign season, these members (through behind the scenes mobilizing of a block vote, without prior open debate) put forward surprise motions to suspend the LPNY memberships of Stevens and Sloan under the Bylaws.

The method used gamed the existing procedures—suspensions were designed for dealing with a pattern of disruption, not a single alleged episode or mere disagreement, and were supposed to be considered only after a prior review of a written case made for the severe action, etc. Instead, the written case prepared and presented against Stevens was supplied during the meeting when the motion was proposed, allowing zero time for review, or with insufficient review time in the case of Sloan. The “written case,” upon examination afterward, consisted merely of postings of discussion threads where some members hotly disagreed with the views, tone or approach of Stevens or Sloan. Some members later expressed if they had had the time to review the written case before the original vote, they would not have voted to suspend. Stevens’ lifetime LPNY membership was also revoked without even a partial reimbursement of his dues, a violation of his membership contract.

The rampant bias behind the action was noted by statements from neutral third party LPNY members, who commented on it at the time. Attempts to table the motions due to these objections were disregarded, as was the matter of the conflict of interest involved by certain members involved in litigation with Sloan voting on his suspension. The fact that the court had dismissed Sloan’s case about favoritism on procedural grounds (the initial judge, and appeals courts, ruled he had filed after the deadline for litigating the matter) was spun as “Sloan’s suits had been thrown out” based on the substance, the latter of which never got to be litigated. Sloan has also pointed out that in one of the suits against another committee member that was litigated on the substance, the judge ruled in his favor. This and other mitigating context appeared to have no impact on the faction set against LPQC, and the two wrongfully suspended members. The bias was compounded by the rulings over the dispute by the parliamentarian, who was on record from before 2010 as against the Queens chapter, and whose rulings, then and in following years, were consistently prejudicial against Stevens, Sloan and LPQC.

While the bylaws stated the suspended members could motion to seek final appeal of the vote by the next state convention,  it was widely understood the instigators of the cynically composed suspensions, who controlled the convention business meeting, would (in likewise cynical fashion) simply table the motion to “run out the clock” thereby completing the expulsion of the two members. To head off this outcome, LPQC unanimously voted at their county convention of 2011 to issue a formal complaint statement to the LPNY state committee, advocating they vacate the invalidly performed suspensions. LPQC advised the membership status of Stevens and Sloan was unresolved until the issue was addressed, and that LPNY should at least modify the bylaws to clarify members expulsed at the state level could serve as officers at the local level, especially if they were members of good standing at the national level or other states. The basic answer of the state committee, to both the complaint and the bylaws change, was to ignore both issues for years.

The 2016 Issues

While many supported this faction-led committee stance out of opposition to some of Sloan’s litigation activity, which was thought to be potentially hurtful to encouraging people to join the party, its actual effect was to actually destabilize involvement of long-standing members with the party, which discouraged many Libertarians in Queens from continuing to be active with LPNY. LPQC continued to point out that its complaint to the LPNY state committee over the blatantly suspect expulsions had never been properly resolved, and its members therefore continued to elect Stevens and/or Sloan to local officer positions. It also noted that the fact that both members continued to be active LP members nationally or in other LP chartered organizations around the country (Stevens was PA state chair in 2012, and Sloan has served as an officer in the San Francisco LP for several years). Over the course of this period, at least four state Chairs who served multi-year terms sided with LPQC, along with a few national officers (such as Larry Sharpe), a sign that a constructive resolution to the issue was nearing. In 2015, a state committee vote to effectively reinstate Stevens failed due to a tie vote, an outcome further indicating the unreasonable faction was losing its influence.

But when LPQC again announced it would propose the motion once more in 2016, the same faction who engineered the disputed actions of 2010 mobilized, outside of proper open debate at a state committee meeting, to generate a block vote to remove the charter of LPQC, over “violating the bylaws” (by not removing the LPQC officer status of Stevens). LPQC disputed the charge, pointing out the unresolved complaint about the suspension votes, the unreimbursed dues to Stevens, and that he and Sloan were properly elected local chapter officers under the bylaws. Even though LPQC stated the motion to de-charter was out of order, to which the Chair agreed, the block vote assembled overruled him, and the committee voted to remove LPQC’s charter. The intent was to remove LPQC so it would no longer have the standing to reprise the complaint against the suspensions going forward.

Immediately after the vote, lo and behold, the leaders of the removal of the chapters introduced a Queens Republican to the meeting, who had already agreed to serve as a TCC (Temporary County Chair) for forming a new Queens chapter. Neither info on this individual, or the group of members he formed the new chapter with, had ever been provided to LPQC in the months beforehand. This represented a certain “flexibility” and selective attention to the rules the faction had not allowed for, or afforded to LPQC. The new TCC held a founding meeting months later without all members of LPNY in Queens (in particular, the members of the de-chartered chapter) being notified, a violation of the bylaws designed to prevent the disenfranchised Queens members from being represented in the new chapter. In promoting the LP citywide nominating convention in 2017, former LPQC persons who were LPNY members were again not notified, also in violation of the bylaws.

Going Forward

These actions were disingenuous, outrageous and discpicable when they happened, and remain so today. As a result this top-down, divisive approach to chapter building, the new, replacement or “Astroturf” Queens chapter had three years of struggle gaining any traction in the borough. Only with the success of Larry Sharpe in 2018 did a group emerge, under Queens Chair Michael Arcati, that was stable enough to perform the transition into a more viable, now “permanent ballot status” LP chapter under NY Election law. The original LPQC re-formed as the Queens Libertarians by January 2017, and has continued its schedule of “second Saturday of the month” meetings (from 1994 to present), refusing to be defined by the attacks on its reputation and defamation of its long term members. QL is currently transitioning into functioning as a PAC, while retaining its speaker program and monthly discussion based meetings. QL regrets that the new Queens LP had to suffer from being mostly kept in the dark about how the previous group was bullied out of its charter.

Both QL and the new LP of Queens have reached out to each other by the end of 2018, and approved a solidarity motion for the two groups by summer 2019. The joint statement affims essentially that QL recognizes the Queens LP as the “real LP chapter” and recommends its members join it, while LP Queens recognizes the circumstances concerning the treatment of LPQC in the 2010s was never properly resolved by the old LPNY state committee,  and has not been helpful to party development in Queens. Sam Sloan was recently elected as Treasurer of the Bronx LP chapter, meaning under the new circumstances following 2018, wrongfully or supposedly “expulsed” LPNY members can and should be able to serve as officers at the local LP level, just as LPQC has steadfastly maintained.

The improvement of the party’s growth and professionalism in New York eventually finally occurred due to the emerging influence of LP leaders from the Western side of the state since 2014, and Queens business consultant Larry Sharpe’s success in obtaining permanent ballot status for LPNY through his 2018 Gubernatorial campaign. These leaders have largely replaced the remnants of the old state committee, who had been so intent on what they called their “good works” of demeaning, excluding or isolating all figures and chapters who differed from them (as with their disenfranchisement of “the Procida group” or LPQC). This remnant still wants to exercise these toxic veto powers, however, and recently complained that the old LPNY organization’s rules (under the old bylaws) should still govern the new LPNY structure that is officially recognized as a party under the state’s election laws. Sam Sloan has named names in calling out the remnants who campaign for permanent “hub” control of LPNY and micro-management of the local chapters:

“…The Blay Tarnoff Group was noted for internal disputes and the efforts of Blay Tarnoff and Gary Donoyan to expel the John Procida Group led by Tom Stevens from the Libertarian Party.
The John Procida Group [LPQC] is by far the longest standing and most continuously active Libertarian group in New York State.
Blay Tarnoff wants to keep out of the Libertarian Party Tom Stevens who he expelled and all the other people he expelled from the party.
In other words, the “good works” he refers to were actually bad things Tarnoff did and that was the reason the party never got more than 50,000 votes until now.
In 2010 the Libertarian Party candidate got 48,359 votes. We easily would have gotten more than 50,000 votes had the absentee ballots been counted.
The reason the absentee ballots were not counted was Blay Tarnoff went on an orgy of expelling people he did not like, especially Tom Stevens. Instead of building up the party he was intent on tearing it down.”

And that, friends of liberty, is the more complete context, or the rest of the story. Peace and Freedom, in the 2020s and beyond!